Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Motive, Method and Madness: Same motive = same killer - by Fisherman 41 minutes ago.
Mary Jane Kelly: A theory about some injuries! - by Fisherman 1 hour and 5 minutes ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Same motive = same killer - by RockySullivan 1 hour and 5 minutes ago.
Mary Jane Kelly: A theory about some injuries! - by Fisherman 1 hour and 13 minutes ago.
Conferences and Meetings: American Jack the Ripper - True Crime Conference, Baltimore, April 7-8, 2018 - by ChrisGeorge 2 hours ago.
Conferences and Meetings: American Jack the Ripper - True Crime Conference, Baltimore, April 7-8, 2018 - by GUT 3 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Maybrick, James: Acquiring A Victorian Diary - (40 posts)
Mary Jane Kelly: A theory about some injuries! - (16 posts)
Conferences and Meetings: American Jack the Ripper - True Crime Conference, Baltimore, April 7-8, 2018 - (14 posts)
Tumblety, Francis: Tumblety - Hermaphrodite. - (10 posts)
Witnesses: Why doubt a soldier murdered Tabram? - (5 posts)
Shades of Whitechapel: Centenaries - whole and half - (5 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Doctors and Coroners

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 09-05-2014, 01:54 PM
Phil Carter Phil Carter is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,134
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monty View Post
I do assume, am I incorrect?

The information is neither. Then again it depends on what speific image you are referring to.

Monty
You may be correct and you may not be.

I am referring to the Elizabeth Stride image that is not in the National Archives with all tie other victim photos in a nice little presentation album where it should be.

What specific image other than that are you referring to then?

Phil
__________________
Chelsea FC. TRUE BLUE AND CHAMPIONS AGAIN. 💙


Justice for the 96 = achieved
Accountability? ....
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-05-2014, 01:56 PM
Natasha Natasha is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 585
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil Carter View Post
Hello Natasha,

I would like to think and hope you are correct :-) I fear the photo police may be a street ahead of you though. And such pearls are being kept hush hush due to "ownership of information " rights- whatever that is.

best wishes

Phil
The information aint made up.

Ownership issues. I don't think there are any restrictions on mentioning the photographers from back then.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil Carter View Post
Then you assume it to be a female. Well- you had a 50-50 chance there.

If the information I have been told- twice- is not correct are you telling me the person is in err or just deliaerately lying?


Phil
I am a female by the way
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-05-2014, 02:01 PM
Monty Monty is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Leicestershire
Posts: 5,177
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil Carter View Post
You may be correct and you may not be.

I am referring to the Elizabeth Stride image that is not in the National Archives with all tie other victim photos in a nice little presentation album where it should be.

What specific image other than that are you referring to then?

Phil
The same.

However it is now you who is assuming.

Monty
__________________




Author of Capturing Jack the Ripper.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/1445621622
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-05-2014, 02:05 PM
Phil Carter Phil Carter is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,134
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Natasha View Post
The information aint made up.

Ownership issues. I don't think there are any restrictions on mentioning the photographers from back then.



I am a female by the way
Hello Natasha,

I was not referring to you when writing to Monty. :-)

I didnt assume the infnrmation to be made up either- I merely expressed the hope that you are correct that further photos exist in the families you mentioned. :-)

Apparently the information on the name of the Eddowes photographer is unable to be released as that information is, apparently, under ownership according to SPE who knows the photographer's name but cannot tell us.

Phil
__________________
Chelsea FC. TRUE BLUE AND CHAMPIONS AGAIN. 💙


Justice for the 96 = achieved
Accountability? ....
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 09-05-2014, 02:06 PM
Natasha Natasha is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 585
Default

I mentioned those specific photographers, because they had a connection to the east end.

I have not said of which of them took some of the pictures, I am making an assumption based on their connection to the east end.

The fact that these photos were in actual fact the property of the police, not the people who own them now (with exception to archives, crime museum etc), makes me wonder who is in possession of these pics.

If the photographer(s) who took the pics had possession of them, then passed them on to relatives, then I still think they had no right to keep these pics because they were evidence.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 09-05-2014, 02:11 PM
Phil Carter Phil Carter is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,134
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monty View Post
The same.

However it is now you who is assuming.

Monty
and in what way am I assuming? Because I have been told the Stride photo is not in the National Archives together with the other victim photographs. I am sure you will tell me I have been misinformed if so and in what way then?

Phil
__________________
Chelsea FC. TRUE BLUE AND CHAMPIONS AGAIN. 💙


Justice for the 96 = achieved
Accountability? ....
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 09-05-2014, 02:11 PM
Natasha Natasha is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 585
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil Carter View Post
Hello Natasha,

I was not referring to you when writing to Monty. :-)

I didnt assume the infnrmation to be made up either- I merely expressed the hope that you are correct that further photos exist in the families you mentioned. :-)

Apparently the information on the name of the Eddowes photographer is unable to be released as that information is, apparently, under ownership according to SPE who knows the photographer's name but cannot tell us.

Phil
I hope so too. We could maybe learn alot more about the case if there are.

If the photographer's family have possession of it then I feel that the photographer should not have been allowed to keep pictures for themselves. The pics were evidence after all
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 09-05-2014, 02:15 PM
Monty Monty is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Leicestershire
Posts: 5,177
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil Carter View Post
and in what way am I assuming? Because I have been told the Stride photo is not in the National Archives together with the other victim photographs. I am sure you will tell me I have been misinformed if so and in what way then?

Phil
You have been told a copy is at Scotland Yard, yes?

Monty
__________________




Author of Capturing Jack the Ripper.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/1445621622
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 09-05-2014, 02:16 PM
Monty Monty is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Leicestershire
Posts: 5,177
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Natasha View Post
I hope so too. We could maybe learn alot more about the case if there are.

If the photographer's family have possession of it then I feel that the photographer should not have been allowed to keep pictures for themselves. The pics were evidence after all
Evidence in what?

Monty
__________________




Author of Capturing Jack the Ripper.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/1445621622
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 09-05-2014, 02:21 PM
Phil Carter Phil Carter is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,134
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Natasha View Post
I mentioned those specific photographers, because they had a connection to the east end.

I have not said of which of them took some of the pictures, I am making an assumption based on their connection to the east end.

The fact that these photos were in actual fact the property of the police, not the people who own them now (with exception to archives, crime museum etc), makes me wonder who is in possession of these pics.

If the photographer(s) who took the pics had possession of them, then passed them on to relatives, then I still think they had no right to keep these pics because they were evidence.
Hello Natasha,

I could not agree with you more- about who owns what and where.

IMHO NONE of any of the said photos should be in the posession of any private individual. However the hope that any further or original plates or other- additional photos emerge via photographers families would be interesting.

Phil
__________________
Chelsea FC. TRUE BLUE AND CHAMPIONS AGAIN. 💙


Justice for the 96 = achieved
Accountability? ....
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.