Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Witnesses: Finding Israel Schwartz - by Robert 22 minutes ago.
Mary Jane Kelly: Was Joe Barnettīs alibi accepted lightly? - by Flower and Dean 23 minutes ago.
Hutchinson, George: Hutchinsons statement.... - by Flower and Dean 28 minutes ago.
General Discussion: JtR 3D scenes - by GUT 32 minutes ago.
Hutchinson, George: Hutchinsons statement.... - by Michael W Richards 58 minutes ago.
Hutchinson, George: Hutchinsons statement.... - by Sam Flynn 1 hour and 4 minutes ago.

Most Popular Threads:
General Discussion: New claims Jack the Ripper was noted poet who studied as a priest in the North East - (14 posts)
Hutchinson, George: Hutchinsons statement.... - (14 posts)
Mary Jane Kelly: Was Joe Barnettīs alibi accepted lightly? - (11 posts)
Letters and Communications: An experiment - (11 posts)
General Discussion: Two Years of Articles - (4 posts)
General Discussion: "Red Terror" - (4 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Witnesses

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-11-2016, 01:56 PM
Barrister Barrister is offline
Constable
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 88
Default Right to testify

We all know about the right against self-incrimination. We also know there was a period when people could not testify on their own behalf. What I am trying to discover is when this rule was changed and how. Also, I would like to know when cross-examination of a defendant was permitted. All help will be appreciated.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-11-2016, 02:32 PM
GUT GUT is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: I come from a land Down Under
Posts: 6,838
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barrister View Post
We all know about the right against self-incrimination. We also know there was a period when people could not testify on their own behalf. What I am trying to discover is when this rule was changed and how. Also, I would like to know when cross-examination of a defendant was permitted. All help will be appreciated.

Do you mean in England?

And

When you ask about Cross examination of the defendant being allowed, I'm not sure what you mean. Up to very recent years a defendant in a Criminal Trial could give an unsworn "Dick Statement" on which he couldn't be cross examined, most jurisdictions have abolished these and now S/he must either shut up, or give sworn testimony and be subject to cross examination, so I can't think of a time in recent jurisprudence when there wasn't the opportunity for a defendant (or any other witness) who gave sworn testimony to be cross examined.
__________________
G U T

There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-14-2016, 02:52 PM
Mr Lucky Mr Lucky is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 646
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barrister View Post
We all know about the right against self-incrimination. We also know there was a period when people could not testify on their own behalf. What I am trying to discover is when this rule was changed and how. Also, I would like to know when cross-examination of a defendant was permitted. All help will be appreciated.
Historically it depends on what type of charge the defendant was facing;- misdemeanour, felony or treason and the issue could be further complicated by which branch of law and which type of court was being used.

If you're referring to time around the ripper murders and referring to felony, the full use of defence council was after 1836 ( second report of the criminal law commission) and allowing the defendant to testify under oath was the Criminal Evidence Act 1898.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.