Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Perfect mDNA match is proof of fraud

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Perfect mDNA match is proof of fraud

    Hi all,

    According to the article, Karen Miller's (maternal descendent of Eddowes) mDNA is a 100% perfect match with Eddowes and Matilda's (maternal descendent of Kosminski) mDNA is a perfect match with Kosminski.

    It is physically impossible for the mDNA of a descendent to be a perfect match with an ancestor. A generational mDNA mutation rate of 3 X 10 to the minus 5 guarantees this.

    A 100% perfect match CAN ONLY MEAN ONE THING, the mDNA on the shawl is the same at the living descendent's, i.e., it's a fraud.

    ...unless the article lied and it wasn't a 100% perfect match. If so, falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus.

    Sincerely,

    Mike
    The Ripper's Haunts/JtR Suspect Dr. Francis Tumblety (Sunbury Press)
    http://www.michaelLhawley.com

  • #2
    Am I wrong on this point?
    The Ripper's Haunts/JtR Suspect Dr. Francis Tumblety (Sunbury Press)
    http://www.michaelLhawley.com

    Comment


    • #3
      Well you know my view.

      I have viewed literally hundreds of DNA reports in paternity matters that is is Mr "X" the father of child "B". So pretty close relationships the highest I have ever seen [and remember we are talking nuclear DNA here] is 99.9999% or 1 chance in a million that it's wrong.

      So 100% nope, don't think there's a DNA lab in the world that would sign off to that.

      However I don't think that it's fraud just "puff" to garner interest.
      G U T

      There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

      Comment


      • #4
        Puff it is then. Thanks GUT
        The Ripper's Haunts/JtR Suspect Dr. Francis Tumblety (Sunbury Press)
        http://www.michaelLhawley.com

        Comment


        • #5
          In case you don't know puff = BS.
          G U T

          There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by GUT View Post
            In case you don't know puff = BS.

            Comment


            • #7
              I thought 'Puff' was a magic dragon. But so is this shawl.

              Mike
              huh?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by The Good Michael View Post
                I thought 'Puff' was a magic dragon. But so is this shawl.

                Mike
                WHAT???

                The Shawl is a Magic Dragon, now t all makes sense.
                G U T

                There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Is the shawl made from hemp? Can we smoke it?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Is it known whether these tests were carried out using the LCN DNA testing method?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Limehouse View Post
                      Is it known whether these tests were carried out using the LCN DNA testing method?
                      Short answer no not known at this point of time.
                      G U T

                      There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Thanks GUT.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          not wrong

                          Hello Mike. No, not wrong.

                          Frankly, how could it EVER be shown that these "descendants" did not deposit their DNA recently?

                          Cheers.
                          LC

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by mklhawley View Post
                            Hi all,

                            According to the article, Karen Miller's (maternal descendent of Eddowes) mDNA is a 100% perfect match with Eddowes and Matilda's (maternal descendent of Kosminski) mDNA is a perfect match with Kosminski.

                            It is physically impossible for the mDNA of a descendent to be a perfect match with an ancestor. A generational mDNA mutation rate of 3 X 10 to the minus 5 guarantees this.

                            A 100% perfect match CAN ONLY MEAN ONE THING, the mDNA on the shawl is the same at the living descendent's, i.e., it's a fraud.

                            ...unless the article lied and it wasn't a 100% perfect match. If so, falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus.

                            Sincerely,

                            Mike
                            I won't waffle on but the one thing has made me doubt all this is quite a simple one the man behind all of this has recently opened a ripper shop that sells a lot of interesting things including an authentic very collectable hand crafted made from the finest plastic that mankind can provide yoyo.check at the website www.jacktherippertoursandstore.co.uk
                            Three things in life that don't stay hidden for to long ones the sun ones the moon and the other is the truth

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Pink ,

                              I never had you down as a yoyophobe.

                              MrB

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X