Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Mary Jane Kelly: Oh, murder! - by David Orsam 2 hours ago.
Mary Jane Kelly: Oh, murder! - by David Orsam 2 hours ago.
Mary Jane Kelly: Oh, murder! - by Pierre 2 hours ago.
Mary Jane Kelly: Oh, murder! - by David Orsam 3 hours ago.
Mary Jane Kelly: Oh, murder! - by Pierre 3 hours ago.
Mary Jane Kelly: Oh, murder! - by David Orsam 4 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Cutbush, Superintendent Charles Henry: The Curtis Bennett Inquiry - (13 posts)
Neil, P.C. John: PC Neil's Route - (7 posts)
Mary Jane Kelly: Oh, murder! - (7 posts)
Shades of Whitechapel: Centenaries - whole and half - (4 posts)
General Discussion: Spies And General Secret Squirrels - (3 posts)
General Discussion: "Servant Girl Annihilator" Terrorized 1880s Austin, Texas - (1 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Motive, Method and Madness

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 12-22-2016, 12:25 PM
David Orsam David Orsam is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 5,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Abby Normal View Post
you don't want--it was a lump of coal
At least that would useful.

And it would probably be about as helpful in explaining the CSG.
__________________
Orsam Books
www.orsam.co.uk
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-22-2016, 12:26 PM
Pierre Pierre is offline
Assistant Commissioner
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 3,566
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jerryd View Post
Hard to argue with that data when it is not disclosed. Don't you think a better approach to all this would be to remain quiet until you can present all of your data and then see what comes of it?
Yes, and I am sorry for that. But there is a name on it and the name is also in the case of the Whitechapel murders.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-22-2016, 12:28 PM
Elamarna Elamarna is offline
Superintendent
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: north london
Posts: 2,384
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre View Post
You mean that without a reference you can not access the source. That is what you mean.

I understand that everyone thinks that this case will never be solved. A long time has passed and many ideas have blurred the view on the sources.

But I think it is solved, Steve. And I am trying my best to give you what I can.

I do not expect anyone to believe me. But I do think that the case is solved.

The only reason I think that is the sources. They are too many, too coherent and too explanatory. They could not exist if they were not explaining the murders.

There is data both inside the Whitechapel murders case and outside it. Data is on a micro level. It is highly explanatory and throws light over old unanswered questions.

The GSG was one of those questions but it is not a question anymore.

Regards, Pierre


All very clear Pierre, but until you give source details for others to check, the sources you say exist do not.

Its really very simple, you do not take another persons work as being gospel.

Its the sources which as you rightly say will prove the case.

So we need the sources do we not!!


Steve
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-22-2016, 12:29 PM
Elamarna Elamarna is offline
Superintendent
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: north london
Posts: 2,384
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre View Post
Yes, and I am sorry for that. But there is a name on it and the name is also in the case of the Whitechapel murders.
Pierre Jerry is right, if you are not prepared to give details, then say nothing.

Steve
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-22-2016, 12:32 PM
Pierre Pierre is offline
Assistant Commissioner
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 3,566
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elamarna View Post
All very clear Pierre, but until you give source details for others to check, the sources you say exist do not.

Its really very simple, you do not take another persons work as being gospel.

Its the sources which as you rightly say will prove the case.

So we need the sources do we not!!

Steve
Steve,

I am analyzing the sources constantly and I would like to come to a point in this were I can sit down and write the book to give you the whole history with all the sources. I am fighting with my academic conscience all the time. Is it the right point in time now to do this or not. Do I have all the material. Is there still data I must look into. And so on and so forth. And I know that there is still a little work to be done.

Regards, Pierre
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-22-2016, 12:35 PM
Pierre Pierre is offline
Assistant Commissioner
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 3,566
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elamarna View Post
Pierre Jerry is right, if you are not prepared to give details, then say nothing.

Steve
But donīt you think it is interesting that the GSG has an explanation?

You should not "believe" me, but you may at least try another thought.

Look at the set of statements I make in the OP and say what you think. You can pretend it is just another ripperologic book or article.

Without believeing it: What do you think about the content? What sort of a history is it?

Regards, Pierre
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-22-2016, 12:40 PM
David Orsam David Orsam is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 5,248
Default

Will he be doing the present tomorrow then?
__________________
Orsam Books
www.orsam.co.uk
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12-22-2016, 12:44 PM
GUT GUT is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: I come from a land Down Under
Posts: 6,752
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Abby Normal View Post
I hope you saved the gift receipt, because I would like to return it
I thought of just regifting it back to the original gifter.
__________________
G U T

There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 12-22-2016, 12:47 PM
GUT GUT is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: I come from a land Down Under
Posts: 6,752
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jerryd View Post
Pierre,

You have critiqued a document and interpreted it the way you think it reads. You have not provided the source for anyone else to do the same. Are we supposed lay down and agree with you on those terms? The historical sources all say the word on the wall was in some form or fashion 'Jews'. Not judges. Where do you draw the line for what historical sources are correct and incorrect? Only when it fits into your theory? You have done nothing to change the status quo.
He might have decided not to give the source he interprets after what happened with gogmagog, he gave his interpretation, and the source, and got destroyed, by just giving his interpretation when he is destroyed he can claim "but mine was a different source".
__________________
G U T

There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 12-22-2016, 12:49 PM
GUT GUT is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: I come from a land Down Under
Posts: 6,752
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Orsam View Post
I'm seeing mention in this thread to a "source".

Where do I find this source?

And when are we going to get our xmas present?
Maybe he means Sauce, you know Cranberry for on Turkey, Brandy for on Pud, etc.
__________________
G U T

There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.