Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Mary Jane Kelly: Oh, murder! - by Pierre 6 minutes ago.
Cutbush, Superintendent Charles Henry: The Curtis Bennett Inquiry - by David Orsam 14 minutes ago.
Cutbush, Superintendent Charles Henry: The Curtis Bennett Inquiry - by Robert 29 minutes ago.
Non-Fiction: Ripper Confidential by Tom Wescott (2017) - by The Station Cat 43 minutes ago.
Mary Jane Kelly: Oh, murder! - by John G 44 minutes ago.
Non-Fiction: The Bank Holiday Murders by Tom Wescott (2014) - by The Station Cat 49 minutes ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Mary Jane Kelly: Oh, murder! - (25 posts)
Non-Fiction: Ripper Confidential by Tom Wescott (2017) - (14 posts)
Cutbush, Superintendent Charles Henry: The Curtis Bennett Inquiry - (11 posts)
Witnesses: 12:45 am - (5 posts)
Annie Chapman: Row over soap..................... - (3 posts)
Shades of Whitechapel: Centenaries - whole and half - (2 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Media > Periodicals

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-26-2016, 03:53 PM
Toofew Toofew is offline
Cadet
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 41
Default Haunt of the Resurrection Men

The American Journal of Archaeology has an interesting article dealing with the reuse of unclaimed cadavers by students from the Royal London Hospital in the early 1800's. As the deceased patients were largely East End residents, I thought some would like the article. Based upon the article, times were even tougher in the early 1800's than the 1880's.

http://www.archaeology.org/issues/89...spital-burials

Billy
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-26-2016, 03:58 PM
GUT GUT is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: I come from a land Down Under
Posts: 6,744
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toofew View Post
The American Journal of Archaeology has an interesting article dealing with the reuse of unclaimed cadavers by students from the Royal London Hospital in the early 1800's. As the deceased patients were largely East End residents, I thought some would like the article. Based upon the article, times were even tougher in the early 1800's than the 1880's.

http://www.archaeology.org/issues/89...spital-burials

Billy
Tough times indeed.
__________________
G U T

There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-26-2016, 05:20 PM
Robert Robert is online now
Casebook Supporter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,483
Default

Apparently it wasn't actually illegal to take a corpse from its grave - indeed, poor people barely had graves, for their bodies were buried so shallow that they could often be seen protruding from the earth. What was illegal, however, was if the corpse was removed with its shroud on, for this was deemed theft (of a shroud). Therefore cautious body-snatchers left the shroud behind.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-26-2016, 10:02 PM
Rosella Rosella is offline
Chief Inspector
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,542
Default

Since medieval times bodies in shrouds in overcrowded churchyards were dug up by the local grave digger and sexton after several years and their bones chucked in charnel houses in order to make way for others.

By the 19th century that was no longer considered acceptable and in the 1840's the disgusting condition of many church graveyards in large cities, with skulls and bones sticking up out of the ground in overcrowded disorder, led eventually to an Act establishing municipipal, council cemeteries.

Earlier, Henry Warburton, a radical member of Parliament who had tried in vain to get laws changed governing the dissection of human bodies, tried again in the wake of the Burke and Hare and Italian boy scandals. This time he succeeded and the bill for regulating schools of anatomy became law in August 1832.

Permission had to be granted from that time by the Inspector of Anatomy (a newly created post) before bodies could be given to anatomy schools by executors and functionaries in charge of public hospitals and workhouses etc; a death certificate had to be signed by a doctor, and the bodies of executed criminals were not to be dissected but were either 'to be hung in chains or buried within the precincts of the prison'.

Obviously this Act stopped resurrection men in their tracks as there wasn't much point in grabbing bodies from graveyards if they weren't signed off by the Inspector. From then on the schools had to rely on paupers or people donating their bodies to science.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-29-2016, 08:24 AM
miss marple miss marple is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 691
Default

The public graveyardswere also a thread to health in the early 19th century not only were they overcrowded, there were several outbreaks of cholera which spread due to the diseased bodies affecting the water supply. There was a demand for out of town buriel. Landscaped graveyards built in healthy spots. The first in London was Kensal Green, allowed by the 1832 Act of Parliament [ there was a cholera outbreak at the time]. The act allowed for the building of many landscaped cemeteries over the next twenty years, built by private companies, These cemetaries were popular with the middle and upper middle classes for there beauty and security.
They still had to have pauper graves for the indiginant.
The 'Magnificent Seven' in London are Kensal Green, Nunhead, Highgate, Abney Park, Brompton, Tower Hamlets and South Norwood.

Miss Marple
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-29-2016, 08:41 AM
Robert Robert is online now
Casebook Supporter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,483
Default

I believe Haworth of Bronte fame still suffers from the effects of past burials.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.