Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Motive, Method and Madness: JtR was Law Enforcement Hypothesis - by Busy Beaver 11 minutes ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: JtR was Law Enforcement Hypothesis - by Herlock Sholmes 57 minutes ago.
General Police Discussion: Leaving one's beat - by Pcdunn 7 hours ago.
Maybrick, James: And This Is Factual! - by Pcdunn 7 hours ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: JtR was Law Enforcement Hypothesis - by Simon Wood 8 hours ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: JtR was Law Enforcement Hypothesis - by jerryd 9 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Motive, Method and Madness: JtR was Law Enforcement Hypothesis - (8 posts)
Maybrick, James: Diary Handwriting - (8 posts)
Maybrick, James: And This Is Factual! - (3 posts)
Rippercast: Questions for Michael Hawley - Jack the Ripper Suspect Dr. Francis Tumblety - (2 posts)
Maybrick, James: One Incontrovertible, Unequivocal, Undeniable Fact Which Refutes the Diary - (2 posts)
General Police Discussion: Leaving one's beat - (1 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Suspects > Stephen, James Kenneth

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-27-2008, 06:20 PM
joeyhawks joeyhawks is offline
Cadet
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1
Exclamation J K Stephen Hardcore proof?

i am a writer who is in the process of doing research for a jack the ripper musical, whilst researching I came across a non- fiction book called JACK THE RIPPER REVEALED by John Wilding

he has a theory that JK stephen and Montague Druitt were the combined team of Jack the ripper, throughout the book he has a large amount of circumstantial evidence to build up a strong convincing case that they did it.

including the ending chapter, chapter 15 the ripper revealed, this is where he gives proof of who the killers were.

he claims that the writing on the wall and two of the letters are actually anagrams,

i will start with the first liverpool letter

Liverpool. 29th Inst. Beware, I shall be at work on the 1st and 2nd inst, in Minories at 12 midnight, and I give the authorities a good chance, but there is never a policeman near when i am at work. yours, Jack the Ripper

anagram

to charles warren 1 A annie Chapman did not hold berties 2 souvenirs. 2 I work at it - I lie in wait i.e the 9th November, Montague Druitt and I gag a bitch. I rip open Kelly. I save HRH crown on a 12th stroke. James Stephen.

2nd liverpool letter

Prince William St., L'pool. what fools the police are. I even give them the name of the street where i am living. yours jack the ripper.'

anagram

I kill. Can the police trap me? I live in a Watling Street harem with people who love to fight fire. Come here. yours, James Stephen. V.R.

graffiti on the wall

The Juwes are the men that will not be blamed for nothing.

anagram

F.G Abberline. Now hate M.J. Druitt. He sent the woman to hell.

surely this is proof enough that they were the killers, also the ripper case was closed on 1892 the year that J K stephen died.


has anyone else read the book or heard of this theory?

i searched the forums and the web but found nothing about it, surely this solves who he was?

if this has been posted somewhere else forgive me.

but if someone replied i would be much obliged

Joeyhawks
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-27-2008, 07:03 PM
The Good Michael The Good Michael is offline
Assistant Commissioner
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Hsinchu, Taiwan
Posts: 3,773
Default

Joey,

The problem with the 'solution' is that anagrams can be made out of anything. Did you notice the incredibly poor grammar in the anagrams? One might be tempted to say, "Yeah, but it's as good as can be expected when trying to make two messages out of one. If it were me, I'd add extra words as needed to make the grammar better.

Consensus around here is that JK Stephen had nothing to do with it.

Cheers,

Mike
__________________
huh?
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-27-2008, 07:04 PM
Premium Member
The Grave Maurice The Grave Maurice is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Western Canada
Posts: 1,674
Default

Yikes. Where to begin? Maybe you should have a look at the review of Wilding's book on the Ripper Media pages. It pretty much sums up the opinion of serious researchers about this theory. So far as I know, no one has taken it seriously. Anagram solutions are always suspect and, as a rule, they aren't worth the paper---or wall---that they're written on.

Keep looking for a source on which to base your libretto. This one will fall flat.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-27-2008, 07:46 PM
Mike Covell Mike Covell is offline
Superintendent
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: From Hell, From Hull
Posts: 2,957
Default

I thought the book was a "PantsofBag"

As it was mentioned earlier anagrams are open to interpratation and could mean anything to anyone. Plus you would expect a tutor to the prince to be able to spell!
__________________
Regards Mike
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-27-2008, 09:04 PM
Dan Norder Dan Norder is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 852
Default

Given enough letters you have the flexibility to find anagrams that say anything, really. For example, this line:

Quote:
Originally Posted by joeyhawks View Post

i searched the forums and the web but found nothing about it, surely this solves who he was?
anagrams to:
Quote:
Hidden in the post by joeyhawks

You love death... snub, murder the wife.
Slasher nabbed?
Wow, this s
hit out of nothing cheats us.
Joeyhawks here surely must be a murderer himself. I mean, that's hardcore proof right there. Right?
__________________

Dan Norder
Ripper Notes: The International Journal for Ripper Studies
Web site: www.RipperNotes.com - Email: dannorder@gmail.com
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-27-2008, 09:09 PM
Sam Flynn Sam Flynn is online now
Casebook Supporter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wales
Posts: 9,736
Default

"Wow, this $hit out of nothing cheats us" -- which should be printed as a statutory warning on the cover of many a suspect-centric "Ripper" book
__________________
Kind regards, Sam Flynn

"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-28-2008, 12:46 AM
Cap'n Jack Cap'n Jack is offline
*
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: jersey, channel islands
Posts: 1,497
Default

'Wow, this $hit out of nothing cheats us" -- which should be printed as a statutory warning on the cover of many a suspect-centric "Ripper" book'.

But only when you and Dan have written one, eh Sam?
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-18-2008, 12:39 PM
Uncle Jack Uncle Jack is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Nottingham, England
Posts: 576
Default

With anagrams, we are once again going down the Lewis Carroll path. If I read a book, as soon as the word 'anagram' is mentioned, I tend to not continue. Not saying I am closed minded but anagrams as "proof" in the Ripper case just doesn't work for me. If that was the case, we could point the finger of anyone who wrote a letter in 1888.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-19-2008, 06:35 PM
dmcdonald@onwight.net dmcdonald@onwight.net is offline
Cadet
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cowes, Isle of Wight, England
Posts: 45
Default

Hi Joeyhawks
Am afraid I agree with everyone else regarding the anagram theory - which I did wade thru!! If you are interested in fact about JK Stephen then try my book (probably less fun much much straighter). 'The Prince, HIs Tutor and the Ripper'. Well I have to try to push it here as I don't have the advantages of Patricia Cornwell!!

Regards and good luck with the research.

Deborah McDonald
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-12-2010, 03:18 PM
Uncle Jack Uncle Jack is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Nottingham, England
Posts: 576
Default

Yes I highly recommend Debs' book. Very good read and not a daft anagram in sight!!
__________________
Best regards,
Adam


"They assumed Kelly was the last... they assumed wrong" - Me
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.