Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What do Maybrick believers believe about Jim as Jack?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by caz View Post
    Hi MayBea,

    Interestingly, one of the sources said by modern hoax theorists to be reflected in the diary text - Bernard Ryan's The Poisoned Life of Mrs Maybrick - mentions on page 29 that in November 1888 James was complaining to his new Liverpool doctor of 'ceaseless headaches over a period of three months, of a numbness of the left leg and hand after smoking heavily or taking too much wine, and of various skin eruptions...'

    One wonders why modern hoaxers failed to milk this heaven sent information for all it was worth, unless they knew nothing of Blotchy, or otherwise felt such symptoms might hinder rather than help their cause.

    Love,

    Caz
    X

    PS What's all this bollocks about the shawl?
    It's solved! again.
    Three things in life that don't stay hidden for to long ones the sun ones the moon and the other is the truth

    Comment


    • #17
      How ironic is it that Mrs. Maybrick wanted arsenic to eliminate her skin eruptions, and Mr. Maybrick, if it is true, had skin eruptions because of arsenic?!

      Comment


      • #18
        "Oh costly intercourse of death."

        Any thoughts on the Diarist's usage of this quote from poet Robert Crashaw, related to the 17th century definition of 'intercourse' as trade, commerce and communication.

        *http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/intercourse

        First recorded usage related to sex was in 1798*, a hundred years after Crashaw.

        But even in late 19th Century, one of our Fathers of Confederation (1867) was promoting 'free intercourse from sea to sea'.

        Comment


        • #19
          Hi MayBea,

          This part of the diary concerns the murders, and the bad effect they are having on "Sir Jim", and has nothing to do with sexual intercourse. So quite apart from the million other reasons for rejecting Mike Barrett's forgery claims, I cannot accept that he found these words in a book at home, thought they sounded appropriate in the context of sex and death, and plonked them in the diary at this point. Whoever quoted those words put more thought into it than that, IMHO, and more understanding.

          Love,

          Caz
          X
          "Comedy is simply a funny way of being serious." Peter Ustinov


          Comment


          • #20
            It's the perfect quote, Caz, in the context of a merchant/trader who's a killer suffering with the dark repercussions of his acts.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by MayBea View Post
              It's the perfect quote, Caz, in the context of a merchant/trader who's a killer suffering with the dark repercussions of his acts.
              It might have been the perfect quote, MayBea, had any evidence emerged that the real James Maybrick would have been familiar with Crashaw's poetry.

              Otherwise, it's a bit of a mystery why Crashaw - whose father had coincidentally been vicar of the original 'white chapel' - features at all. I would suggest that the diary's creator knew this titbit and included the quote quite deliberately for their "Whitechapel Liverpool/Whitechapel London" theme. Seems fitting somehow.

              Love,

              Caz
              X
              Last edited by caz; 01-07-2015, 09:25 AM.
              "Comedy is simply a funny way of being serious." Peter Ustinov


              Comment


              • #22
                I agree that Crashaw was a lost poet. An online source says not even Shelley knew of him. (Notes and Queries - Google Books)

                So I take it you believe the reference came from the Liverpool Crashaw compendium published in 1866 and not the Sphere volume of poetry, therefore written by a Victorian 'diarist' and not a modern one.

                Originally posted by pinkmoon View Post
                It's solved! again.
                There was one other 'blotchy faced' suspect named John Anderson, but he was pock-marked not really blotchy. If Cox could distinguish a carroty mustache, she could probably tell the difference between scars and blotchiness.
                http://www.casebook.org/ripper_media...jmorley/5.html

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by MayBea View Post
                  I agree that Crashaw was a lost poet. An online source says not even Shelley knew of him. (Notes and Queries - Google Books)

                  So I take it you believe the reference came from the Liverpool Crashaw compendium published in 1866 and not the Sphere volume of poetry, therefore written by a Victorian 'diarist' and not a modern one.
                  Not sure how anyone could establish who Shelley didn't know about.

                  But yes, I could more easily accept an older source than a modern one for Crashaw's cameo in the diary. That doesn't help me date the writing though.

                  Love,

                  Caz
                  X
                  "Comedy is simply a funny way of being serious." Peter Ustinov


                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by MayBea View Post
                    I agree that Crashaw was a lost poet. An online source says not even Shelley knew of him. (Notes and Queries - Google Books)

                    So I take it you believe the reference came from the Liverpool Crashaw compendium published in 1866 and not the Sphere volume of poetry, therefore written by a Victorian 'diarist' and not a modern one.


                    There was one other 'blotchy faced' suspect named John Anderson, but he was pock-marked not really blotchy. If Cox could distinguish a carroty mustache, she could probably tell the difference between scars and blotchiness.
                    http://www.casebook.org/ripper_media...jmorley/5.html
                    Nice story .
                    Three things in life that don't stay hidden for to long ones the sun ones the moon and the other is the truth

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      You mean the John Anderson story?

                      It's pretty good.

                      I didn't know Crashaw was the vicar of Whitechapel's namesake (Church of St. Mary's Matfelon). It can't be coincidental.

                      Now who would know that? Maybe the son and grandson of a parish clerks.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        I've never seen this story associated with Jack the Ripper before:
                        * One of St Mary Matfelon’s origin stories places it in the hand of a French Murderer. In about 1428, a devout widow of Whitechapel was murdered by a man who was French or Briton born, after killing the woman in her bed he fled with jewels and “other stuff of hers. He was chased to the Church of St George in Southwark and challenged Privilege of Sanctuary. Unfortunately for him he was arrested and the next day taken back through Whitechapel where “the Wives cast upon him so much Filth and Ordure of the Street that ... they slew him out of Hand.”
                        There are indications that from it's early establishment Whitechapel was always going to be the place where Jack the Ripper would strike and weirdness would ensue.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          St. Mary Matfelon's is an Anglican church and St. Peter's in Liverpool, where James' father and grandfather were parish clerks is, of course, Anglican.

                          Someone was familiar with Crashaw's poetry, but no more-so than James and his Anglican friends.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Somewhere in my several miles of bookshelves is an old (1930's or 1940's) compendium of British Poets volume which contains at least one of Crashaw's poems. So he was at least still in print as recently as that. Also, his works were I think first collected and published in full in about 1860 by a Mr Turnbull, so there is no reason to suppose he wasn't passing popular at that time. Could be that his poetry may have been taught in schools at the time, and that a middle-class youth like James Maybrick may well have picked some up during his school days. Crashaw's stuff is pretty obscure and metaphysical, not at all to today's tastes I should think, who who knows? Incidentally, his father was a red-hot bible-banging Puritan, which I should think our Richard might just possibly have railed against. There's quite a bit to be found about Crashaw on the internet, worth a quick scan if you're interested. I can't believe that Shelley had never heard of Crashaw.

                            Another little bit of obscure info concerning Maybrick. I've just finished reading "If Walls Could Talk" by the lovely and hugely-entertaining Dr Lucy Worsley, and in it she makes passing mention of Charles Darwin being hooked on a "medicine" called Fowler's Solution to ease his dyspepsia. This stuff contained potassium arsenite amongst other horrors, and was sold as a cure-all, but particularly for use in digestive problems and, astonishingly, leukemia. Darwin described a feeling of nausea plus a tingling in his toes as, quote Lucy, "positive signs that the drug was working". She then adds that Darwin exhibited 21 of the 26 known symptoms of arsenic poisoning. I'd never heard of this jollop prior to reading Lucy's book, but I wonder if this is how our Jim got into arsenic big time. He complained of pain in his legs, so maybe the toe-tingling Darwin described was working its way upwards. Doesn't bear thinking about.

                            Graham
                            We are suffering from a plethora of surmise, conjecture and hypothesis. - Sherlock Holmes, The Adventure Of Silver Blaze

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              My source, Notes and Queries, says Mary Shelley's list of Percey's influences didn't include Crashaw, but actually her journal only has his reading list for 1815.

                              http://www.gutenberg.org/files/37955...-h/37955-h.htm

                              Even if James didn't know of Richard's father, William Crashaw, in England, he could have heard of him in Virginia where William was a significant figure in the promotion of the Virginia colony.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                More questions:

                                If Brierley isn't the "whoremaster", then who are the other candidates?

                                Does the medicine bottle found dated October 25 put James back in England on that date, getting refills?

                                The Maybrick Case: A Treatise... page 589 (Google Books)

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X