Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Mary Jane Kelly: Why Mary had to die. - by David Orsam 5 minutes ago.
General Suspect Discussion: H H holmes - by paul g 13 minutes ago.
General Suspect Discussion: H H holmes - by DirectorDave 17 minutes ago.
General Suspect Discussion: H H holmes - by paul g 19 minutes ago.
Goulston Street Graffito: The GSG - Did Jack write it? POLL - by etenguy 19 minutes ago.
Goulston Street Graffito: The GSG - Did Jack write it? POLL - by Wickerman 26 minutes ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Goulston Street Graffito: The GSG - Did Jack write it? POLL - (51 posts)
Tumblety, Francis: Tumblety - Hermaphrodite. - (17 posts)
General Suspect Discussion: H H holmes - (5 posts)
Mary Jane Kelly: Why Mary had to die. - (4 posts)
General Police Discussion: The single source question - (4 posts)
Mary Ann Nichols: Intent to eviscerate? - (3 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Witnesses

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-28-2016, 01:55 AM
Natasha Natasha is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 585
Default 'Witness' Elizabeth Long Accomplice?

Hi All

Forgive me If this has been mentioned before, but I believe Long may have been an accomplice/ suspect to Chapmans murder. Why? Well seeing as she was adament that she saw Chapman alive at 5.30. When Chapman was discovered at 6.30 why was rigor commencing? Philips believed she had been dead for at least 2 hrs. He then said that due to the cool weather this could be the reason why. But wait a minute, based on the following I doubt it; If the ambient (room) temperature is too close to body heat, Algor Mortis will be quicker, and this would mean the body will get stiff with Rigor Mortis quicker. If the body is kept cold, Rigor Mortis could be postponed even a few days.*

Also Long's husband had access to carts

What do you lot think bout this

Last edited by Natasha : 07-28-2016 at 01:58 AM.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-29-2016, 02:40 AM
Natasha Natasha is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 585
Default

Would like to add also that Cadaveric spasm or instantaneous rigor, is actually a rare occurrence. Which is why I believe Chapman was not murdered at the time proposed. I think she may have been dumped there. How can the killer perform mutilation s etc in the dark? I also believe Eddowes may have been dumped at Mitre Square, at least was taken there after rendered unconcious. I said in another thread that I reckon she was already dead when seen by Lawende. it explains the missing half hour
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-29-2016, 05:34 AM
Premium Member
wigngown wigngown is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: UK 🇬🇧
Posts: 145
Default

Interesting, Natasha. Those issues you highlight have always rested uneasily with me. It seems probable to me, although I'm relatively new to these forums & I'm sure those more seasoned in the Murders will have a good counter argument, that they very well could have murdered elsewhere & left to be found; with the exception of Kelly, of course.
__________________
wigngown 🇬🇧
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-29-2016, 05:39 AM
Premium Member
wigngown wigngown is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: UK 🇬🇧
Posts: 145
Default

Parts 2. Or, the Killer was well versed, as far as he able to be, with the comings and goings at that particular time of day, Police, Workers and the like, knew the area very well and had several escape routes in the event of being disturbed. Whichever it was, certainly, he was very cunning and I believe left little if anything to chance.
__________________
wigngown 🇬🇧
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-29-2016, 11:52 AM
Joshua Rogan Joshua Rogan is online now
Inspector
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,310
Default

Hi Natasha,
Are you saying that, because Mrs Long's timing didn't match the Doctor's estimate, she must have had something to do with the murder?
What about Albert Cadosch, who heard someone or something bang against the fence at 05:20-05:25, or John Richardson, who said the body wasn't there at 04:45? Neither of their timings match either...were they all in it together?
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-29-2016, 01:27 PM
John G John G is offline
Assistant Commissioner
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,987
Default

As I've noted before, estimates of time of death should be taken with a pinch of salt. In fact, because of the many variables the current Forensic Science Regulator states that it shouldn't even be attempted.

Thus, in the case of rigor mortis, there haven't even been any large longitudinal studies on random samples. However, it is known that there are large "inter-individual variability, due to both endogenous and exogenous factors." (Payne- James et al, 2003).

For instance, in the 19th century Nickdorn study rigor was fully established after 4-7 hours in the majority of cases. However, in two cases it took a mere 2 hours, and in another two cases 13 hours.

See:https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=...tion&f= false

Currently, the most useful means of estimating the time of death is Henssge's Nomogram, which relies on three measurements: body temperature, ambient temperature and body weight. However, even this method is at best 2.8 hours either side of the most likely time of death so a total spread of 5.5 hours (ibid p61.)

As for whether Eddowes was killed elsewhere, I believe there are many problems with this argument, however, it's worth considering, particularly as Lawende is hardly the most inspiring of witnesses.

Last edited by John G : 07-29-2016 at 01:56 PM.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-29-2016, 03:17 PM
Natasha Natasha is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 585
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua Rogan View Post
Hi Natasha,
Are you saying that, because Mrs Long's timing didn't match the Doctor's estimate, she must have had something to do with the murder?
What about Albert Cadosch, who heard someone or something bang against the fence at 05:20-05:25, or John Richardson, who said the body wasn't there at 04:45? Neither of their timings match either...were they all in it together?
Hi Josh

Yes I think she may have
If anything Albert Cadosch. Actually further makes my point valuable, seeing as he heard something fall against the fence at 5.20. I think Chapman was killed else where then dumped in the yard. Explains lack of blood splash, only smears were found. Also I'm sure I read there was smears in the hallway of the house in Hanbury, though I don't think she was killed there.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-29-2016, 04:11 PM
Joshua Rogan Joshua Rogan is online now
Inspector
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,310
Default

Well, OK, but you are aware Dr Phillips disagreed aren't you?

"[Coroner] In your opinion did she enter the yard alive? - I am positive of it. I made a thorough search of the passage, and I saw no trace of blood, which must have been visible had she been taken into the yard."
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-29-2016, 04:19 PM
Joshua Rogan Joshua Rogan is online now
Inspector
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,310
Default

There were a few other patches of blood on the wall, here's what he said about them;

"On the back wall of the house, between the steps and the palings, on the left side, about 18in from the ground, there were about six patches of blood, varying in size from a sixpenny piece to a small point, and on the wooden fence there were smears of blood, corresponding to where the head of the deceased laid, and immediately above the part where the blood had mainly flowed from the neck, which was well clotted."

Are you thinking of the blood that was thought to have been seen in a neighbouring house? Phillips couldn't seem to find this;

"[Coroner] You were shown some staining on the wall of No. 25, Hanbury-street? - Yes; that was yesterday morning. To the eye of a novice I have no doubt it looks like blood. I have not been able to trace any signs of it. I have not been able to finish my investigation. I am almost convinced I shall not find any blood.

The Coroner: Have you anything further to add with reference to the stains on the wall?
Dr. Phillips: I have not been able to obtain any further traces of blood on the wall. "
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-30-2016, 02:12 AM
Natasha Natasha is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 585
Default

Such a small amount of blood for someone who had had their throat cut.

The blood in the neighbouring hse, someone may have washed the blood off the wall. Someone who lived there. Nichols blood was washed away, by the witnesses son who lived where Nichols was killed.

The killer may have wrapped up the injuries or attempted to clean the blood away maybe, perhaps that's why Long was there. Also there was no mention of her woollen scarf amongst her possessions. That may have been used to stop the bleeding.

I believe Chapman was dead longer than stated. Long's testimony is fishy. How could Chapman be seen at 5.30 and Cadosch have heard Chapmans possible murder at 5.20/25? He didn't even see any couple in the street. The body was stiff in the legs, I know ppl have different refs for rigor but I would say in general 2 hrs is minimal for rigor to start.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.