Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Hutchinson, George: Possible reason for Hutch coming forward - by Wickerman 11 minutes ago.
Hutchinson, George: Possible reason for Hutch coming forward - by Wickerman 18 minutes ago.
Hutchinson, George: Possible reason for Hutch coming forward - by Joshua Rogan 22 minutes ago.
Hutchinson, George: Possible reason for Hutch coming forward - by Wickerman 23 minutes ago.
Hutchinson, George: Possible reason for Hutch coming forward - by Wickerman 38 minutes ago.
Hutchinson, George: Possible reason for Hutch coming forward - by Wickerman 2 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Hutchinson, George: Possible reason for Hutch coming forward - (46 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Letters and Communications

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 12-01-2015, 01:05 PM
Abby Normal Abby Normal is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 5,438
Default

Of all the purported Ripper writings the following stand out to me as being authentic in order of probability:

GSG
From hell
Dear boss/saucy jack


and just possibly the "winters coming" letter of 1896.

I own Letters from Hell, and most if not all seem like incoherent lame attempts at hoaxes or copy cats, whether signed ripper or not.
__________________
"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"

-Edgar Allan Poe


"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

-Frederick G. Abberline
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-01-2015, 02:48 PM
Premium Member
SirJohnFalstaff SirJohnFalstaff is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Abzurdistan or Canada, depends
Posts: 564
Default

I tend to dismiss Dear Boss and Saucy Jack because they were sent to Central News Agency, which requires some level of journalistic knowledge. I think Jack would have sent them directly to a newspaper.

This said, I think JtR could have very well written one or more letters, simply by the fact that the way he did (not) dispose of the bodies, expressed some kind of defiance, or showing off.

I'm no expert, though.
__________________
Is it progress when a cannibal uses a fork?
- Stanislaw Jerzy Lee
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-01-2015, 03:29 PM
Bridewell Bridewell is offline
Assistant Commissioner
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Bottesford, Leicestershire
Posts: 3,621
Default

Quote:
This said, I think JtR could have very well written one or more letters,
He may have done so if he became aware of how many letters were being written by others claiming to be him. That might appeal - send in the one genuine letter, knowing that it will probably be dismissed along with all the others. But of course that pre-supposes that the killer was at least semi-literate, which he may not have been.
__________________
Regards, Bridewell.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-01-2015, 05:02 PM
Abby Normal Abby Normal is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 5,438
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SirJohnFalstaff View Post
I tend to dismiss Dear Boss and Saucy Jack because they were sent to Central News Agency, which requires some level of journalistic knowledge. I think Jack would have sent them directly to a newspaper.

This said, I think JtR could have very well written one or more letters, simply by the fact that the way he did (not) dispose of the bodies, expressed some kind of defiance, or showing off.

I'm no expert, though.
Hi Fallstaff

Well considering that the ripper was more than likely employed, was a class or so above his victims and probably had some kind of medical knowledge I don't think it's too off the mark that he would have known about the CNA and how to get maximum exposure.

He also says three things in the letters that point to the authenticity-wanting to get to work soon, number one squealed a bit and clipping off the ears, all which pretty much happened.

Serial killers also have been known to send letters all over the place-to the police, press, victims and victim family members, tv stations so who knows why they send them where they do-probably for exposure and fame.

Plus one only need to look at the penmanship of a low life thug like bury to realize that you don't have to be upper class to be able to write well at the time.

And I agree with you. The way he left the bodies, and being able to escape in the nick of time , shows he may have had a secondary motivation of getting off on the taunting aspect of his crimes and beating the police.
__________________
"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"

-Edgar Allan Poe


"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

-Frederick G. Abberline
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-01-2015, 07:07 PM
Premium Member
SirJohnFalstaff SirJohnFalstaff is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Abzurdistan or Canada, depends
Posts: 564
Default

Yeah, but why CNA? it was fairly new. Why not Reuter or others?

I consider JtR to be streetsmart, clever, but not highly educated.

Zodiac wrote directly to the San Francisco Chronicles and other newspapers.

It's possible he was aware of CNA. I admit, it's more a matter of opinion from my part than probability.
__________________
Is it progress when a cannibal uses a fork?
- Stanislaw Jerzy Lee
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-01-2015, 07:25 PM
Defective Detective Defective Detective is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 157
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua Rogan View Post
And yet, it also says "WELL YOU SEE I'VE KEPT MY WORD, AND DONE FOR THE ONE I SAID I WOULD. I SUPPOSE YOU TOOK NO NOTICE OF WHAT I SAID."
So how did the writer previously get in touch, if not by letter?
I asked the same thing when the existence of this letter first came to my attention.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Defective Detective View Post
"Well you see I've kept my word, and done for the one I said I would.

I suppose you took notice of what I said.


These other letters were not written by me at all and has some one been kind enough to give me the name of "Jack The Ripper". I'll accept it and act up to it. Look out for the next.

P.S. You can't trace me by this writing so its no use on the police stations"


Okay, here's a question: if this letter writer had never before written a letter, when did he say he'd do "for the one"? What did he say that we were to take notice of?

This letter obliquely suggests another communication of some kind in its first lines, or so it reads to me, and yet denies having made any previous communication just a few sentences later.
And the user Caligo Umbrator came up with what I consider a very reasonable explanation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caligo Umbrator View Post
Hi, Defective.

The communication you reference does initially appear to have some internal contradictions.
In stating that " These other letters were not written by me. . ." it does seem that the writer is disavowing authourship of any previous missives.

It could be argued, however, that the writer of this letter may have previously sent one or more letters to the authorities, describing his intentions or motivations and that that particular communication has been lost (This letter was addressed to "The Inspector, Leman St. Police").
So that this letter could be, from the authours point of view, a continuation of his 'dialogue' with those connected to the investigation and also a confirmation that at least one previous letter had been offered to them by him.
When he says " These other letters . . ." should we not consider that he might be referring to just those letters that had been made public at the time and published in newspapers and on handbills, rather than all the letters the police had received?

It should also be noted that this particular letter is unusual, when compared to the majority of other 'Ripper" letters, as it is written all in capitals, reasonably neat, correctly spelled throughout and missing just a punctuation point. The writer keeps each sentence on a straight line.
The writing slopes between 12 and 18 degrees rightward from the upright and the sheet it is written upon is almost perfectly square as opposed to the usual short and wide postcard or the tall and thin letter paper of the time.
Capital or block letters, while acceptable for general communication, were not used in most professions, unless clarity was absolutely essential.
One such profession was printing.

I'm sure there are other reasons for using block capitals and perhaps others on here can expand on this matter.

If you have Evans and Skinner's 'Letters from Hell', a facsimile of the letter is reproduced on p.114 and the transcript on p.248-9.

Yours, Caligo.
I'd add that the letter substitutes the word "HAS" for "AS", but I otherwise agree with this analysis. I think the tone of "10/11/88" in particular is quite what I'd expect from the actual Ripper - impatient and proud of his work, but not to the point of the Cockney cariacture of 'Dear Boss' and 'Saucy Jacky'. Assuming for a moment it's ahentic, its author does want recognition, and sounds exasperated by the prevalence of hoaxers, but isn't quite so cartoonishly gleeful as in those missives.

Last edited by Defective Detective : 12-01-2015 at 07:34 PM.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.