Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Maybrick, James: One Incontrovertible, Unequivocal, Undeniable Fact Which Refutes the Diary - by rjpalmer 11 minutes ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Same motive = same killer - by harry 24 minutes ago.
Maybrick, James: One Incontrovertible, Unequivocal, Undeniable Fact Which Refutes the Diary - by Herlock Sholmes 43 minutes ago.
General Letters or Communications: Two authentic comms from the Ripper? - by c.d. 1 hour and 20 minutes ago.
A6 Murders: A6 Rebooted - by OneRound 1 hour and 24 minutes ago.
General Letters or Communications: Two authentic comms from the Ripper? - by c.d. 2 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Motive, Method and Madness: Same motive = same killer - (27 posts)
Maybrick, James: One Incontrovertible, Unequivocal, Undeniable Fact Which Refutes the Diary - (18 posts)
General Letters or Communications: Two authentic comms from the Ripper? - (17 posts)
Maybrick, James: Too Sensible & Competent - (4 posts)
A6 Murders: A6 Rebooted - (2 posts)
Bury, W.H.: Mock trial for Bury Feb 3 - (1 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Suspects > Maybrick, James

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #51  
Old 04-20-2018, 11:23 AM
David Orsam David Orsam is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 7,527
Default

Mike's affidavit is certainly not thrown into question if there is even the slightest doubt that it was in Mike's own words and that he was aware of what he was signing. Affidavits or witness statements are frequently drafted by lawyers on the basis of what a witness has told them and it's not impossible that there can be a misunderstanding over a date which is not picked up in the final draft. If Alan Gray took on the same role as a solicitor, the key thing is that the affidavit was based on what Mike had told him, so unless there is an allegation being made that Gray fabricated the affidavit then, even if Mike didn't read it properly before signing it, it still reflects his version of events.

And what I note is that the key point of my post has been totally ignored. That key point is that there are a number of obvious dating errors in Mike's affidavit. I mean, he says he bought his word processor in 1985. Does the fact that this is the wrong year means that he never bought a word processor? Clearly not. But that's the logic being applied to the guardbook. And Mike says he came up with his forgery story in November 1993, which he then changes to December 1993. But that isn't correct. So does that mean he never offered up a forgery story? No, he did but it was in June 1994. He says that Tony died in about May 1990. But he didn't. So does that mean that Tony didn't die? Obviously not. He died in August 1991. Given these errors, the fact that Mike might have got the date wrong about the acquisition of the guardbook is hardly a fatal flaw.
__________________
Orsam Books
www.orsam.co.uk
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 04-20-2018, 11:31 AM
rjpalmer rjpalmer is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 231
Default

Of course Mike was supposed to have bought the diary from Eddie, but since there is no evidence either way, it hardly matters.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.