Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lets get Lechmere off the hook!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by RockySullivan View Post
    Maybe paul & Lechmere knew each other, didn't they walk a similar route?
    Except their evidence said otherwise.
    G U T

    There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

    Comment


    • Mmm...

      Originally posted by RockySullivan View Post
      Maybe paul & Lechmere knew each other, didn't they walk a similar route?
      Yes, along with 88 other Pickford's workers living in Whitechapel.....

      Amanda

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Amanda View Post
        Yes, along with 88 other Pickford's workers living in Whitechapel.....

        Amanda
        But Paul didn't work at Pickford's did he??
        G U T

        There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

        Comment


        • No...

          Originally posted by GUT View Post
          But Paul didn't work at Pickford's did he??
          Hi Gut,
          No sorry, was referring to Cross/Lechmere.

          Just meant there would be dozens of other blokes walking to work at Pickford's along the same or similar route.
          Amanda

          Comment


          • Originally posted by David Orsam View Post
            yet Constable Neil saw "a pool of blood" (not strictly true!)
            I'm not now sure why I made the comment in parentheses because it is true! "There was a pool of blood where the neck of deceased was lying in Buck's-row" (Evidence of PC Neil, Times 3 Sept 1888).

            Comment


            • The title of this thread is thoroughly misleading there's nothing to put Lechmere on the hook in the first place.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Fisherman View Post
                A thread in which I would like for people to state what speaks against Lechmere as being the Whitechapel killer.

                Here is the perfect opportunity to overwhelm me with good hard evidence that he could not have dun it, inklings why he would be innocent, cleverly thought-out scenarios that must exclude Charles the carman, convictions, expertise, experience - anything that tells us why Charles Allen Lechmere could or would not have been the Ripper.

                Once it begins dropping in, I aim to process and list it, and at some stage, I will post the outcome.

                Itīs a one-in-a-lifetime chance - who would have thought that I would present a thread by such a mouthwatering name...? Go for it and go hard!

                Good luck and all the best,
                Fisherman
                Lechmere saw an unknown policeman with the victim.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by John Wheat View Post
                  The title of this thread is thoroughly misleading there's nothing to put Lechmere on the hook in the first place.
                  Best post on the thread.
                  G U T

                  There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by GUT View Post
                    Best post on the thread.
                    But there is a hook. The fishermanīs hook.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Pierre View Post
                      Lechmere saw an unknown policeman with the victim.
                      Where does he say this?
                      I won't always agree but I'll try not to be disagreeable.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X