Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Maybrick, James: Acquiring A Victorian Diary - by David Orsam 3 minutes ago.
Maybrick, James: Acquiring A Victorian Diary - by David Orsam 8 minutes ago.
Maybrick, James: Acquiring A Victorian Diary - by David Orsam 12 minutes ago.
Maybrick, James: Acquiring A Victorian Diary - by David Orsam 16 minutes ago.
Maybrick, James: Acquiring A Victorian Diary - by David Orsam 18 minutes ago.
Maybrick, James: Acquiring A Victorian Diary - by David Orsam 19 minutes ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Maybrick, James: Acquiring A Victorian Diary - (33 posts)
Tumblety, Francis: Tumblety - Hermaphrodite. - (14 posts)
Shades of Whitechapel: Centenaries - whole and half - (7 posts)
Conferences and Meetings: American Jack the Ripper - True Crime Conference, Baltimore, April 7-8, 2018 - (7 posts)
Mary Jane Kelly: A theory about some injuries! - (7 posts)
General Suspect Discussion: Was Ernest Dowson Jack the Ripper? - (5 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Witnesses

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #34  
Old 09-08-2017, 05:08 AM
Pierre Pierre is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,407
Default

[quote=Elamarna;428300][quote=Pierre;428264][quote=Elamarna;428251]

Quote:
PIERRE
You do not know what arguments I am going to present, or if I will use the terms you say are unacceptable. Instead you critise a few comments I have made here to encourage debate.
And it is not for you to say what arguments we may make or which words we use. Something's never change do they my friend such has your elitism.

STEVE (!),

You are now reducing methodological problems to "who is to say what arguments we use" and to "elitism".

Whatever you think about my comments, they are relevant. It is a matter of methodology. So, if you think methodology is not relevant, just say so.

Quote:
Your view of 31st August from what one can tell is based on accepting Mizen told the truth.
I will explain why I feel this is a false premise, not based on "if" or "what" or the testimony of Paul and certainly nothing to do with Thain and the slaughter men.
I will however give the alternative theories, such as the classic scam and your take on it too.
It will then be left for the reader to make up their mind. I suspect that probably appalls you, as the readers are not historians.
I see. It is "entertainment" again. OK. So it is now clear that you have not chosen "real science" which you told us you would. OK.

So perhaps Fisherman is better than you? At least he does no claim to use "science" without doing just that. Actually, I think he is looking better and better as a ripperologist!


Quote:
And No the 19th September Report is signed by both Swanson and Abberline, not just Swanson has you have now twice said.
Which page are you speaking about in the sourcebook, Steve?

Quote:
We disagree over the interpretation my friend accept such and live with it.
Indeed.

Quote:
I guess you can tell my patient is wearing thin.
I have no issue with this sort of attack
Ah! So now the questions posed and the criticism is an "attack"!

Very telling, Steve. One is no allowed to discuss your "methods", then one is accused of attacking.

Quote:
when I present my Hypothesis, indeed I expect far worse. However I did specifically ask that we did not descend to this before that point. And you have disrespected that request.
"Disrespected" Steve? In this very post you say:

Instead you critise a few comments I have made here to encourage debate.

And now you have this debate, you have encouraged me - and you tell me it is wrong?

Pierre
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.