Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Mary Jane Kelly: ORIGINAL doors in Miller's court - by Wickerman 38 minutes ago.
Scene of the Crimes: Miller's Court Demolition Photo - by richardh 3 hours ago.
Scene of the Crimes: Miller's Court Demolition Photo - by DJA 3 hours ago.
Scene of the Crimes: Miller's Court Demolition Photo - by richardh 4 hours ago.
Scene of the Crimes: Miller's Court Demolition Photo - by DJA 4 hours ago.
Scene of the Crimes: Miller's Court Demolition Photo - by richardh 5 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Scene of the Crimes: Miller's Court Demolition Photo - (6 posts)
Mary Jane Kelly: ORIGINAL doors in Miller's court - (3 posts)
Maybrick, James: One Incontrovertible, Unequivocal, Undeniable Fact Which Refutes the Diary - (3 posts)
Goulston Street Graffito: Letter dated 14th October 1896. - (3 posts)
General Police Discussion: PC Richard Pearce and the candle in the window...... - (1 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Social Chat > Pub Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #121  
Old 02-09-2018, 07:38 AM
Svensson Svensson is offline
Cadet
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: London
Posts: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ginger View Post
But, for the time being, the fact that Trump is actually trying to solve problems instead of setting his party up for the next election puts him head and shoulders above any recent POTUS.
And this is why I would hope that the media would actually focus on Trump's deeds, not on his words. The problem with Trump is that he can not string two sentences together without either contradicting himself, or flat-out lie. On top of that, his ability to do a 180, followed by a 360 or even a 720 is completely unprecedented. For this reason, anyone can make the argument that Trump is pro-this or anti-that by selectively quoting him. This where the media get into unproductive ****-fights and trump is happy with it because they could be talking about something much worse (as far as he is concerned).

It also depends on what you consider a "problem that needs to be solved".
- If you consider it a problem that there are not enough multi-billionaires, then Trump's your man.
- If you think that anywhere between 13 and 35 million of "the forgotten people" (as per Trump's inauguration speech) need to lose their health insurance so that the richer ones don't have to subsidise them, then Trump's your man.
- Since this morning, there has been another Trillion added to the deficit, in addition to the 1.5 Trillion with the tax-cut. Ryan and the GOP are already talking about "making tough decisions" and "entitlement reforms" in order to pay for the tax cuts that just to handed 84% of its benefits to the top 1% of the population. This is not a problem that has existed before Trump came along.
- If you think that pursuing a two-state solution in the middle-east is a problem, then Trump's your man because Trump is clearly pursuing a one-state solution.


Other stuff that he has "created":
-making it easier for veterans to apply for commercial licenses or access apprenticeship programs (Good, but why only for such a small group?)
- out of the 100-something laws he signed into law, there is very little substantial apart from the tax-cut (and that alone could warrant its own thread):https://edition.cnn.com/2017/06/29/p...ion/index.html

What has he repealed? There is a lot in there that does not help "the forgotten man" but his billionaire cabinet and to further secure the status and power of the already rich and powerful. Some examples:

- Blocked implementation of a rule that would have made it easier for farmers to sue big agricultural companies.
- Repeal of a bill that mandated that employers maintain records of workplace injuries.
- Removed information about worker injuries from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration website.
- Killed a rule mandating that government contractors disclose past violations of labour law.
-Revoked an executive order that mandated compliance by contractors with laws protecting women in the workplace.
- Ended a rule that barred employers from taking some or all of the tips given to service employees.
- Cancelled a rule mandating that financial advisers act in the best interests of their clients.
- Ended a rule that allowed consumers to file class-action suits against financial companies.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.810466c3ab37

So the problems that he is trying to resolve is the perceived problem that the rich and powerful establishment has with the pesky "little people".

At one point, I was thinking about adding Trump's statement that "the forgotten people will no longer be forgotten" to the Greatest Hoax of all time Thread but I decided that this was not a hoax, just a misunderstanding. Trump's "forgotten men" are his billionaire buddies and white draft dodgers that long for a time when minorities and women still knew their place in society. Everything else is "just for show" as his actions speak louder than words.

The media meanwhile are failing to hold Trump accountable on his policies, that's my gripe with them.

Then again, I'm still confident that he will go down for obstruction of justice, money laundering (both definite) and collusion with a foreign power (possibly). My hope is just that he will take Foxnews down with him.

Last edited by Svensson : 02-09-2018 at 07:44 AM.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #122  
Old 02-09-2018, 08:50 AM
Svensson Svensson is offline
Cadet
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: London
Posts: 3
Default

Oh, and let's talk about he glaringly obvious problem that trump has no intention of solving:

Jeanette Manfra, the current head of Cybersecurity at the DHS, that Russia have targetted the voter data of 21 data and concedes that "a small number have been penetrated" (https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/fir...chief-n845886). What is a small number? 2 or 3? What if Russia double their success rate and target ALL 50 states this autumn and they manage to get into 10 or 15 databases? They can create complete chaos.

However, despite all of this, Trump or Nunes, who is supposed to investigate this, are doing nothing at all about this?

And why should they? the Russians are helping Trump. Why should be stop them? THIS is another real scandal IMO and here is another exhibit of Trump colluding with Russia in plain sight of the American people.

Ok, I'll take my pills now and lie down again.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.