Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Maybrick, James: Acquiring A Victorian Diary - by Kaz 10 minutes ago.
Maybrick, James: 25 YEARS OF THE DIARY OF JACK THE RIPPER: THE TRUE FACTS by Robert Smith - by Kaz 23 minutes ago.
Hutchinson, George: Possible reason for Hutch coming forward - by Varqm 30 minutes ago.
General Police Discussion: J Division Fixed Point Whitechapel Station? - by The Station Cat 3 hours ago.
General Police Discussion: Police Orders 1st October 1888 - by The Station Cat 4 hours ago.
Hutchinson, George: Possible reason for Hutch coming forward - by Michael W Richards 5 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Hutchinson, George: Possible reason for Hutch coming forward - (29 posts)
Hutchinson, George: The Enigma That Is Richard Blake - (1 posts)
General Police Discussion: Police Orders 1st October 1888 - (1 posts)
General Police Discussion: J Division Fixed Point Whitechapel Station? - (1 posts)
Maybrick, James: 25 YEARS OF THE DIARY OF JACK THE RIPPER: THE TRUE FACTS by Robert Smith - (1 posts)
Maybrick, James: Acquiring A Victorian Diary - (1 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Victims > Mary Jane Kelly

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 06-27-2017, 05:52 PM
Wickerman Wickerman is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,901
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DJA View Post
Coal would melt the kettle spout off.
Source of funding is the point.

Dried horse dung would have been difficult to obtain,given the weather.
Crikey,even in Melbourne during the 1950s nobody would think of drying and burning the stuff.
Mum used to put it on the garden.
Not many gardens in Whitechapel, but plenty of dung.
__________________
Regards, Jon S.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-27-2017, 06:23 PM
DJA DJA is offline
Inspector
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Some Australian Mountain Range.
Posts: 1,307
Default

http://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK...risis-of-1894/
__________________
My name is Dave.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-27-2017, 11:46 PM
jason_c jason_c is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 787
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Damaso Marte View Post
I always marvel at people who consider the MJK murder "risky" in comparison to any of the other Whitechapel killings. In my mind it's the least risky murder in the entire series, no matter what time the light was on.
Another one here who agrees with this. Assuming Kelly was a semi competent prostitute(and she believed regular clients to be her bread and butter) then at least half an hour of privacy were as good as guaranteed between Kelly and her killer. Add the fact it was probably the middle of the night then the chances of the killer being interrupted were small.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-28-2017, 02:32 AM
Harry D Harry D is online now
Superintendent
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 2,025
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by c.d. View Post
Assuming for the sake of argument that Mrs. Maxwell is correct in her time does this tell us anything that we didn't know already?

c.d.
In the grand scheme of things? Probably not. Some might argue that it rules out certain suspects (Astrakhan Man, Mr. Blotchy) but what's stopping either of them returning later that morning? It also propagates the idea that MJK wasn't the victim found in Miller's Court.
__________________
Hail to the king, baby!
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-28-2017, 02:51 AM
richardnunweek richardnunweek is offline
Superintendent
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,216
Default

Hi.
The most likely morning suspect, was the man who was across the road looking suspicious seen by Mrs Lewis , during the night [ who was not Hutchinson] because Kelly had a long staying visitor, he put off his intentions until he saw her outside Ringers,[ when Maxwell saw him in the morning around 8.45 am].
Regards Richard.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-28-2017, 04:44 AM
Bridewell Bridewell is offline
Assistant Commissioner
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Bottesford, Leicestershire
Posts: 3,621
Default

I'm pleased that this topic has finally got its own thread. The main evidence for a night-time killing seems to me to be Bond's six hour claim for the onset of rigor mortis. I'm not convinced that this was the accepted view then and it certainly doesn't appear to be so now. In fairness to Bond the margin for error will only have been increased by the great length of time which had elapsed before he had access to what was left of the body. There is also the view that the injuries to MJK would have taken two hours. A friend who is a master joiner told me that the external mutilation could have been done in seconds with a draw knife. That leaves only the internal abominations. It's a crude measure, certainly, but how long does it take a butcher to fillet a pig? Two hours? I wouldn't have thought so.

How hot was the room at the time of death and in the immediate aftermath? We don't know and can only surmise.


http://www.encyclopedia.com/medicine...y/rigor-mortis

The above link gives a more modern view of the onset time for rigor as 4 hours. That would not be inconsistent with a TOD between 9am and 10am - and that would not conflict with the eye witness testimony of Maxwell and Lewis.

I don't subscribe to the view that the body was not that of MJK. That's an unnecessary complication and one not supported by the evidence. The fact that the body was grossly mutilated does not justify an assumption that the motive for this was to conceal the identity of the victim. There was no fingerprint technology in the LVP and a change of identity was relatively easy, meaning that MJK could have disappeared very easily by moving to another area and changing her name without the need for a sacrificial lamb to replace her.
__________________
Regards, Bridewell.

Last edited by Bridewell : 06-28-2017 at 05:00 AM.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 06-28-2017, 06:59 AM
Abby Normal Abby Normal is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 5,438
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by richardnunweek View Post
Hi,
It was recently mentioned, that we never really have had a thread, that was dedicated to this .
So I have started one.
I have always believed Mrs Maxwell , and to a point other witnesses, that claimed to have seen the woman Kelly that morning.
How about you?
Regards Richard.
Hi Richard
I don't believe her. While I think her sighting possible, and don't rule it out, I think she was mistaken.

Maurice lewis sighting however I totally discount-ther simply isn't enough time from his sighing of her in the bar some time after 10:00 and Bowyers discovery at 11:00 for her to have left with a man, gone back to her place, all that to occur and the killer to get out not being seen. so IMHO we can throw his sighting out.

I have several issues with maxwells sighting:

she claims to know her well, by name, but says she only spoke to her a couple of times before.
The coroner seemed to take issue with her sighting.
I still don't think there was enough time for her sighting also and all to take place before Marys body was discovered at 11:00.
The large fire with burnt clothes, by the killer, indicates a night time killing.
The corroborated screams of murder heard around 4:00am indicate a night time killing.

But the main issue I have with her sighting (and Mary being killed in daylight morning) is the condition mary was in. Someone sick to the point of vomiting in the street is going to be in no condition to solicit prostitution and have sex. No way. Not only that but Mary apparently told her she already had been to the pub for some hair of the dog, but then threw up. So after that she is going to go back to bar again?looking for clients? nope.

I think more than likely, Maxwell, knew someone who she thought was mary.
Probably a transient who was about millers court for a few months and then moved on.
__________________
"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"

-Edgar Allan Poe


"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

-Frederick G. Abberline
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 06-28-2017, 09:56 AM
richardnunweek richardnunweek is offline
Superintendent
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,216
Default

Hi,
If Maxwell was mistaken , it was most likely with Lizzie Albrook , who apparently worked in Dorset street lodging houses,
''Saw the deceased about the lodging house'' claimed Mrs M, she was young like Mary and may have caused Maxwell to be mixed up, she also lived in Millers court.
Regards Richard.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 06-28-2017, 11:10 AM
Paddy Goose Paddy Goose is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 165
Default

That's an interesting thought you have, Richard.

And now we know Elizabeth Prater was the same age as well. And she lived right there. Maybe Mrs Maxwell saw her.

Paddy
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 06-28-2017, 11:39 AM
Simon Wood Simon Wood is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,218
Default

Hi All,

If you look closely at Dr. Phillips inquest testimony, and compare it with his remarks made in The Times, 12th November, you'll find that Mrs Maxwell wasn't necessarily mistaken about her encounter with Kelly.

Regards,

Simon
__________________
Fidiamo in Legno.
http://deconstructingjack.net/
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.