I refer you to your post 844, where you commented on my statement that Paul could have been out of earshot:
Until such time as you can prove the carmen both lied, your theory is dismissed by them.
Your statement is incorrect.
And to post 972, where this is said: I will say again.*
There is nothing in the acvount of Mizen which challenges the account of the Carmen, that they were together and both spoke to Mizen.* Therefore it is not possible that Paul was out of earshot.
I donīt think more needs to be said on the point.
Lets look at those posts.
844: "until such time as you can prove"
Clearly in line with my response that you have not proven the possibility.
Post 972.: different langague but still the same point, the evidence of the carmen is not challenged, therefore you have not proven it is possible
Again in keeping with my view.
I do not say i have proven it is impossible, only that you have not demonstrated that such is possible.
Indeed that seems very clear and nothing else need be said i agree.