Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Maybrick, James: Acquiring A Victorian Diary - by caz 3 hours ago.
Hutchinson, George: Possible reason for Hutch coming forward - by Abby Normal 3 hours ago.
Hutchinson, George: Possible reason for Hutch coming forward - by Robert St Devil 3 hours ago.
Maybrick, James: Acquiring A Victorian Diary - by caz 4 hours ago.
Hutchinson, George: Possible reason for Hutch coming forward - by Wickerman 4 hours ago.
Hutchinson, George: Possible reason for Hutch coming forward - by Wickerman 5 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Hutchinson, George: Possible reason for Hutch coming forward - (31 posts)
General Discussion: Who is Lipski? - (8 posts)
Witnesses: Why doubt a soldier murdered Tabram? - (7 posts)
Maybrick, James: Acquiring A Victorian Diary - (6 posts)
Doctors and Coroners: Baxter's influence on Ripper lore - (3 posts)
Non-Fiction: "Ripperland" by Andrew Firth - (1 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Letters and Communications

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-06-2016, 01:19 PM
David Orsam David Orsam is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 7,017
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre View Post
Letīs see if someone will manage to answer them.
Always willing to oblige, I'll have a go then Pierre.

1. What would happen if we forget about the interpretation of this word as having anything to do with jews? - We might end up with a theory that it has something to do with Masons.

2. What would happen if one uses a dictionary to try and understand the word? - One would find that the word "Juwe", or "Juwes", is not in the dictionary.*

*other than as an old English spelling of Jew.
__________________
Orsam Books
www.orsam.co.uk
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-06-2016, 01:22 PM
GUT GUT is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: I come from a land Down Under
Posts: 7,174
Default

So more of Pierre's "Iknow something you don't, and I'm not telling".

Cause "I'm the great scientist"?
__________________
G U T

There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-06-2016, 01:28 PM
David Orsam David Orsam is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 7,017
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre View Post

No, it is the right premise. According to the myth, Hiram Abiff was in Israel to build King Solomons temple. So we are still inside the same old box.
No we are not in the same box because the derivation of the supposed (but actually non-existent) Masonic word "Juwes" was said to come from the names Jubela, Jubelo and Jubelum, i.e. the three Juwes. It had nothing to do with anyone being Jewish, and no connection with the English word "Jews".
__________________
Orsam Books
www.orsam.co.uk
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-06-2016, 01:30 PM
David Orsam David Orsam is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 7,017
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre View Post
What did they find?
See my post #11.
__________________
Orsam Books
www.orsam.co.uk
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-06-2016, 01:37 PM
Craig H Craig H is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 273
Default

Hi Spyglass

One idea being considered is that JTR was a police official (Met Police or City of London Police) and the killings were done to humiliate or embarrass Police leadership.

I'm not sure about this but fine with exploring idea

Craig
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-06-2016, 01:38 PM
Pierre Pierre is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,407
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elamarna View Post
Not been around much recently.
Quote:
holiday and sickness.
Hi Steve, sorry to hear about that.

Quote:
One of the problems with the "Experiment" suggested is that there are many like myself who do not believe the text has anything to do with the apron found close by, nor the Killer and thus nothing to do with the MURDERS.
But then one could still try and answer the two questions. That could give some ideas for a method to discuss the text even if one does not think the text was constructed by the killer.

Quote:
Now others of course disagree on this, but no one has been able to provide direct evidence of a link in the past 128 years. There is much discussion over and over again on this issue, unfortunately a consensus has and probably never will be agreed.
Well, leaving the old box and thinking new thoughts might help finding some evidence. Perhaps one might even reconsider the standpoint of not believing the killer wrote it.

Those who see the murders as planned certainly will always argue in favour, those like me who see them as random and unplanned will always on the whole argue against and probably the majority who are in neither camp will change their minds over a link every so often.

Craig, interesting point, however do we have a secondary confirmation for the lines you quote. I would like a contemporary Source/Reference for the information, did the author give one i have not read Harrison's book?

Having said it is interesting i still have to say I see little to link the writing to the killer.

Given that we have:

No 100% accurate report of the spelling.
No 100 accurate report of the text.
And actually no accurate report of the layout, there are several versions flying about as we are all aware.

Quote:
The terms "neat" and "schoolboy hand" are based on reports given at the time agreed; but they are highly subjective being based on the interpretation of the person giving the report, those terms should not be taken as sacrosanct. my view of neat and good schoolboy hand writing maybe and probably are different to the next persons
Well, the graffito was also very small. Not like the more common graffiti propaganda.

Pierre, not had a chance to say hello since your return, Open to thinking outside the box, you finished your 1st post by asking 2 questions:

"1. What would happen if we forget about the interpretation of this word as having anything to do with jews?"


Quote:
well yes that has already been done several times, the obvious well know version being the Masonic theories,
No. The masonic theories are based on jewish mythology. So we have the word "j e w" again and are still inside the old box.

Quote:
Craig has now also offered a second view.
Iīve heard about that view before but it is still inside the box: "Jew-ry / "Jew-es". Etcetera.

Quote:
I therefore do not see, how by answering that question we can think outside the "BOX", many already do believe what you contemplate.
Oh, dear. Is it really that hard? Look at the word stem, Steve. Are we really super glued to it? The first question was "What would happen if we forgot about" it...

"2. What would happen if one uses a dictionary to try and understand the word?"

Quote:
Has David said already this has been looked at, i have just done an online search again, I can find nothing other than references back to the murders of 1888. Am I missing something?
Steve, look at the word stem. After you have seen it, forget it. Then you can not use it on the internet. So what is your next strategy? Thinking stepwise like this we are working out a new method.

Quote:
Can one ask what your researches into the word have revealed? what dictionary have you used?
I am not discussing that matter. But that doesnīt mean I am not interested in methodology. And I am sure you have much better dictionaries than I have, even if you may not need them.

Great hearing from you, Steve, and good to discuss methodology with you!


All the best

Steve

Kind regards, Pierre

Last edited by Pierre : 03-06-2016 at 02:02 PM.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-06-2016, 01:40 PM
David Orsam David Orsam is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 7,017
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre View Post
No. The masonic theories is based on jewish mythology. So we have the word "j e w" again adn are still inside the old box.
Incorrect - see #13.
__________________
Orsam Books
www.orsam.co.uk
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-06-2016, 01:44 PM
Craig H Craig H is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 273
Default

Hi Pierre

What do you mean by look at "the word stem" ? I'm not familiar with that (linguistics ?) phrase

Craig
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-06-2016, 01:46 PM
Pierre Pierre is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,407
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Orsam View Post
Quote:
Always willing to oblige, I'll have a go then Pierre.
Great!

Quote:
1. What would happen if we forget about the interpretation of this word as having anything to do with jews? - We might end up with a theory that it has something to do with Masons.
That theory is based on ideas about jewish history. Still inside the same old box.

Quote:
2. What would happen if one uses a dictionary to try and understand the word? - One would find that the word "Juwe", or "Juwes", is not in the dictionary.*

*other than as an old English spelling of Jew.
But how could one find that - if one had entirely forgotten about the word? Then one would not look for it. So what other uses of a dictionary could there be? The method must be new if we should think outside the old box. Is it a good method to continue to search for old things - wouldnīt we not just get the same old answers?

Kind regards, Pierre
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-06-2016, 01:48 PM
Elamarna Elamarna is offline
Assistant Commissioner
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: South london
Posts: 3,715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre View Post
Hi Craig,

I have heard about that but we are still stuck in the same old box with it, since "Old Jewry" and "Jewes" both contain the word "jew".



"Hiram Abiff was in Israel to build King Solomons temple. So we are still inside the same old box."


Do I understand you correctly Pierre you are proposing that Juwes has no connection with either Jews or masons? if so i fully agree on the second point on the first i am undecided and open to another interpretation.

Given that i do not think the text is linked to the murder I have no set point of view on what it might allude to if it does.

I have checked online and cannot find the word Juwes, other than linking it to the text in question. i first checked this when Stephen Knights book was published long ago, there was no entry for the word then either.
I see David is saying much the samething.
if you have different information, what is it?

Steve
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.