it would appear we have the perfect analysis of evidence here,
"The GOGMAGOG-letter is of a very different character compared to the other source. The comparison between the sources makes it clear that the value of the other source is considerably higher. "
Given that we are denied looking at the evidence ourselves, who are we to judge the differences?
Now maybe I am stupid, but are we not being told that because they are different, it is more likely that the poster is right and the evidence is very strong; but what would he have said if they were alike?
Would that make him less likely to be right and the evidence less important?
I can assure you that any more messages from Pierre are fake much like the ripper letters he includes in his theories. Pierre is no more. He's ceased to be. He's run down the curtain and joined the bleeding choir invisible. He is an ex-troll.
Yay, the first Norwegian Blue reference for 2016, may there be many more.
On 13 November 2015, Pierre told us that, in a letter he had found, the author, using a metaphorical language, "gives…the name of Mary Jane Kelly".
This was simply untrue.
After Pierre was forced to reveal the contents of the letter - Craig's persistence in searching for it having paid off - we discovered that the name of Mary Jane Kelly is not found in that letter in any form of language, metaphorical or otherwise, nor is even the name of "Mary" found in that letter in any form of language.
So when Pierre talks about having found someone's full name in metaphorical language in a letter, we can be confident, on the basis of his track record, that the name is not, in fact, to be found in that letter.