Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Eddowes' gut cut

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Fisherman View Post
    That would be interesting. However, I think that what Trevor means is that the cutting force of the edge was directed upwards and not downwards. In other words, Eddowes was gutted much like a fish, where you insert the tip of the knife, let the blade sink in, and then you angle the blade and start cutting the abdomen with the edge pressure directed up instead of down.

    I think that we may be locking ourselves unnecessarily to the idea that the cut went from point A to point B, always travelling in the same direction.
    What is said is that "The cut commenced opposite the enciform cartilage". I take that to mean that it started out somewhere in the area underneath the ensiform cartilage, but in line with it vertically. That is the only "opposite" that makes sense, since the skin over the sternum was unharmed.
    But then it is said that "The incision went upwards, not penetrating the skin that was over the sternum". So, to my mind, the killer inserted the tip of the knife in the upper abdomen, below the ensiform cartilage, the blade being angled with the tip pointing roughly towards the heart, and then he cut like we do when we gut a fish, upwards towards the sternum and with the pressure of the cutting edge directed from the inside and out.
    When he did this, the abdominal wall was cut open and the cut "then divided the enciform cartilage". This would have come about with the blade angled, the way we angle a blade when we gut a fish. And so, this is why it is said that "The knife must have cut obliquely at the expense of that cartilage".
    So the ensiform cartilage was more or less divided from beneath, and the cut in it would have reached furthest up on the inside of it.

    Is this an acceptable solution? The killer plunged the knife in, actually initially cut upwards for an undefined stretch (could have been an inch or two only of course), and then he changed direction and performed all of the rest of the cut downwards. If he wanted to produce as large an opening as possible, I think this would make sense - you plunge the knife in where you know there is no bone structure to stop it, you cut upwards until that bone structure stops the cut, and then you start working downwards.
    Christer,
    Your fish gutting description is very handy.
    Your take on the process seems highly probable.
    It certainly fits with my experience too.

    Steve

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Kattrup View Post
      Thanks for the replies, everybody

      Concerning the sternum, would you agree that the stitching visible on the postmortem photo was a result of the doctors opening the body further? I.e. the killer’s cut did not run the full length of the stitching.

      I’m wondering if we can attribute any other damage visible on the photo to the postmortem rather than the killer?
      Hi agree with Sam and Christer on this.

      Steve

      Also with Joshua, Wickerman and Trevor. Looks like something we can all agree o .

      Steve

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Elamarna View Post
        Christer,
        Your fish gutting description is very handy.
        Your take on the process seems highly probable.
        It certainly fits with my experience too.

        Steve
        Given my moniker, I must confess that I find it slightly unnerving to speak of gutting fish, though ...

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Fisherman View Post
          Given my moniker, I must confess that I find it slightly unnerving to speak of gutting fish, though ...
          Of course. But sometimes its required. It and the knowledge is essential then.

          Steve

          Comment


          • #35
            For those researchers who suggest Eddowes is a copycat, i beleive the stabs/cuts to the liver are very reministent of the cuts to the omentum in the Nichols case. While of course not conclusive it suggests the method and probably the same hand.


            Steve

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Elamarna View Post
              For those researchers who suggest Eddowes is a copycat, i beleive the stabs/cuts to the liver are very reministent of the cuts to the omentum in the Nichols case. While of course not conclusive it suggests the method and probably the same hand.


              Steve
              It is secondary, but not unimportant. The primary matter is that we should not expect mutilators who cut the abdomen open to surface two at the time. In that context, however, any further similarity - like the one you point to - will of course strengthen the case for the same man being responsible.

              And no, I´m not going to elaborate any more on the matter on this thread.

              Comment


              • #37
                Returning to the issue of the cutting of Eddowes, the stabs to the liver and the similar cuts to the omentum of Nichols do indeed suggest a method much as Trevor's expert has suggested.
                To me at least that suggests someone who may not be particularly skilled at using a knife.
                Anyone else have any views on that aspect?
                Hope its not straying off topic.

                Steve

                Comment


                • #38
                  To me, at least the first reported stab to Eddowes' liver was quite likely collateral damage inflicted with the initial plunge of the knife into the abdomen, as Brown says: "Behind this [the ensiform cartilage], the liver was stabbed as if by the point of a sharp instrument".

                  He goes on to say "Below this was another incision into the liver of about two and a half inches, and below this the left lobe of the liver was slit through by a vertical cut." These could have been caused by the initial abdominal incision, and/or sustained as a result of the killer's going after the left kidney - it's perhaps significant in this context that Brown reports a slit in the left lobe of the liver, which would be some distance away from the otherwise midline cut down her upper abdomen. Brown also indicates that the spleen, another organ adjacent to the left kidney, had been damaged, and that the pancreas had been cut on the left hand side.
                  Kind regards, Sam Flynn

                  "Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
                    To me, at least the first reported stab to Eddowes' liver was quite likely collateral damage inflicted with the initial plunge of the knife into the abdomen, as Brown says: "Behind this [the ensiform cartilage], the liver was stabbed as if by the point of a sharp instrument".

                    He goes on to say "Below this was another incision into the liver of about two and a half inches, and below this the left lobe of the liver was slit through by a vertical cut." These could have been caused by the initial abdominal incision, and/or sustained as a result of the killer's going after the left kidney - it's perhaps significant in this context that Brown reports a slit in the left lobe of the liver, which would be some distance away from the otherwise midline cut down her upper abdomen. Brown also indicates that the spleen, another organ adjacent to the left kidney, had been damaged, and that the pancreas had been cut on the left hand side.

                    Thanks for that input Mr Williams

                    Of course that could be seen as arguing against the old tale of organs removed in the dark, with no damage to other organs.
                    While the cuts could be collateral damage, i am still interested in the possability of whatwe may have is a series of jabs and cuts joined togeather rather than a single sustained cut.

                    Possabilitiez, possabilties!


                    Steve

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Hello Steve

                      I've often wondered whether the cut down the abdomen wasn't completed in two or more "stages" and not, to paraphrase The Lancet, one sweep of the knife. There's nothing in Brown's report that says that it was, but then again there's nothing in Brown's report that says it wasn't.
                      Last edited by Sam Flynn; 05-17-2018, 10:48 AM.
                      Kind regards, Sam Flynn

                      "Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
                        Hello Steve

                        I've often wondered whether the cut down the abdomen wasn't completed in two or more "stages" and not, to paraphrase The Lancet, one sweep of the knife. There's nothing in Brown's report that says that it was, but then again there's nothing in Brown's report that says it wasn't.


                        Gareth,

                        "Stages" looks a real possability to me, but would not put it any stronger than that.


                        Steve

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
                          To me, at least the first reported stab to Eddowes' liver was quite likely collateral damage inflicted with the initial plunge of the knife into the abdomen, as Brown says: "Behind this [the ensiform cartilage], the liver was stabbed as if by the point of a sharp instrument".

                          He goes on to say "Below this was another incision into the liver of about two and a half inches, and below this the left lobe of the liver was slit through by a vertical cut." These could have been caused by the initial abdominal incision, and/or sustained as a result of the killer's going after the left kidney - it's perhaps significant in this context that Brown reports a slit in the left lobe of the liver, which would be some distance away from the otherwise midline cut down her upper abdomen. Brown also indicates that the spleen, another organ adjacent to the left kidney, had been damaged, and that the pancreas had been cut on the left hand side.

                          Hi Sam

                          The left lobe of the liver is frequently in the midline and would be easily damaged by a blind stab to the epigastric area below the sternum (or in front of the xiphisternum). As for the spleen, I've seen a splenic laceration from an appendix operation so it certainly is possible from a midline abdominal incision.

                          Paul

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            If Trevor and Fisherman's inside out cut direction is accurate this would categorically rule out somebody with medical training as the Ripper as the usual dissection or surgical method would be the knife on the outer skin cutting down through the tissue, spreading the layers as you advance, rather than an inside out disembowelling

                            Paul

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by kjab3112 View Post
                              The left lobe of the liver is frequently in the midline and would be easily damaged by a blind stab to the epigastric area below the sternum (or in front of the xiphisternum). As for the spleen, I've seen a splenic laceration from an appendix operation so it certainly is possible from a midline abdominal incision.
                              Thanks for the insights, Paul. The triangular wound just below the sternum in the "un-stitched" mortuary photo I referred to a few posts back could therefore have accounted for the cuts to both liver and spleen? Would the same apply for the cut to the left hand side of the pancreas?
                              Kind regards, Sam Flynn

                              "Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
                                Thanks for the insights, Paul. The triangular wound just below the sternum in the "un-stitched" mortuary photo I referred to a few posts back could therefore have accounted for the cuts to both liver and spleen? Would the same apply for the cut to the left hand side of the pancreas?
                                I think all of this now corroborates my belief that she was in fact stabbed several times in the abdomen through her outer clothing and the knife either drawn up or down The description of the cuts to the clothing also corroborates this and the angle of the cuts seems to show that in fact she was stabbed and the knife drawn down.

                                Showing that the motive was nothing more than murder and mutilation carried out in a frenzied attack. Something I would suggest goes to negate the theory that the killers motive was harvesting organs.

                                Please no replies suggesting the taking of the organs was then an afterthought

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X