Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Tumblety, Francis: Tumblety - Hermaphrodite. - by Pinkerton 6 minutes ago.
Tumblety, Francis: Tumblety - Hermaphrodite. - by DirectorDave 19 minutes ago.
Tumblety, Francis: Tumblety - Hermaphrodite. - by Pinkerton 45 minutes ago.
General Suspect Discussion: H H holmes - by DirectorDave 47 minutes ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Same motive = same killer - by RockySullivan 54 minutes ago.
General Discussion: Albert Backert - did he emigrate? - by Nelson 1 hour and 11 minutes ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Witnesses: Why doubt a soldier murdered Tabram? - (10 posts)
Tumblety, Francis: Tumblety - Hermaphrodite. - (8 posts)
General Suspect Discussion: H H holmes - (5 posts)
Motive, Method and Madness: Same motive = same killer - (4 posts)
General Discussion: Albert Backert - did he emigrate? - (3 posts)
General Suspect Discussion: Was Ernest Dowson Jack the Ripper? - (1 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Motive, Method and Madness

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #931  
Old 10-20-2017, 07:51 AM
Joshua Rogan Joshua Rogan is offline
Inspector
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,436
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Debra A View Post
Thanks JR. I have a feeling he may be on the sidelines somewhere in this story. He's never far away is he?!
Mmm, evidently there was more than one eminent doctor who had a keen interest in the case.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #932  
Old 10-20-2017, 07:55 AM
Debra A Debra A is offline
Superintendent
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Yorkshire England
Posts: 2,957
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua Rogan View Post
Mmm, evidently there was more than one eminent doctor who had a keen interest in the case.
The 'eminent London surgeon' in these reports was being put forward as the actual murderer.
__________________
,,`,, Debs ,,`,,
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #933  
Old 10-20-2017, 07:57 AM
Abby Normal Abby Normal is online now
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 5,281
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Debra A View Post
The 'eminent London surgeon' in these reports was being put forward as the actual murderer.
Hi Debs
its a shame we dont know who this London surgeon is?

I know Bond has been put out there by some as being the ripper-could it have been referring to Bond?
__________________
"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"

-Edgar Allan Poe


"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

-Frederick G. Abberline
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #934  
Old 10-20-2017, 08:10 AM
Debra A Debra A is offline
Superintendent
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Yorkshire England
Posts: 2,957
Default

I think the US paper just got it wrong, Abby.
The original PMG interview with Tait was published on the 20th September and billed as the theory of an 'eminent surgeon'
The US press got an earlier cable (17th) and they must have thought the 'London butcher' the eminent surgeon Tait talked of, was an eminent London surgeon being spotted and accused.

The original PMG article also makes it clear that Tait included all the Whitechapel murders and torsos as a series.So that answers my other question.
__________________
,,`,, Debs ,,`,,

Last edited by Debra A : 10-20-2017 at 08:12 AM.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #935  
Old 10-20-2017, 08:26 AM
Debra A Debra A is offline
Superintendent
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Yorkshire England
Posts: 2,957
Default

The PMG rushed that article to press. A statement at the end said the conclusion of the interview with Tait had not reached them at the time the paper went to press. This was the fourth edition of 20th September 1889. I don't know where or when it was concluded.
__________________
,,`,, Debs ,,`,,
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #936  
Old 10-20-2017, 08:32 AM
Debra A Debra A is offline
Superintendent
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Yorkshire England
Posts: 2,957
Default

The full article is in Rob Clack's article on the Pinchin St torso in Ripperologist here:
http://www.ripperologist.biz/pdf/ripperologist143.pdf
__________________
,,`,, Debs ,,`,,
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #937  
Old 10-20-2017, 08:39 AM
Debra A Debra A is offline
Superintendent
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Yorkshire England
Posts: 2,957
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Flynn View Post
I've had the same thought. Hebbert and Tait wouldn't have been the first to do so, either. Not that they'd have been wrong in denying a surgeon's involvement, but there might be a hint of wounded professional pride behind their statements.
Although Hebbert did actually see all the torso cases and witnessed with his own eyes how the joints were opened and disarticulation done. He might have thought to himself that he wouldn't be familiar with how to do that. Dr Phillips also thought a butcher would be better accustomed to separating the head and working on the spine as doctors were never required to do that.
__________________
,,`,, Debs ,,`,,
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #938  
Old 10-20-2017, 11:47 AM
Michael W Richards Michael W Richards is offline
Assistant Commissioner
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,108
Default

Reading about the issues surrounding dismemberment and how unusual an act it was I am reminded of the case of Kate Webster in 1871 in Richmond. This woman murdered her employer then systematically took the remains apart, leaving pieces of her in a pot on the stove, and about Richmond. The victims head was actually found in 2010 when Richard Attenborough was remodeling his house.

The point for me is that doing something horrible isn't particularly unique to the murders in 1888, nor is it something that has to have been done by people who were doing so out of madness. Practicality, deceit, avoidance of punishment are are reasons why some killer exceed the acts required to merely take life.

John Gill in Bradford is another example of dismemberment the same year as this so called "Ripper", and the Torso. Yet the act was never linked with either of those cases.

I would just ad that motives are the key, not the acts.

If anyone can prove that the Torsos were created by someone who killed just so he could make Torsos that would be something, as it is they may have been created merely to dispose, deceive, or avoid detection for murder.
__________________
Michael Richards
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #939  
Old 10-20-2017, 12:01 PM
Michael W Richards Michael W Richards is offline
Assistant Commissioner
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,108
Default

Here is a list of convicted and executed murderers in England in 1888-89:

-David Rees murder of Thomas Davies Carmarthen 13-Mar 1888
-Alfred Scandrett and James Jones murder of Philip Ballard, Hereford 20-Mar 1888
-George Clarke, murder of stepdaughter, Winchester 27-Mar 1888
-William Arrowsmith, murder of his uncle, Shrewsbury 28-Mar 1888
-John Alfred Gell, murder of Mrs Mary Miller, Manchester 15-May 1888
-James William Richardson, murder of William Berridge, Leeds 22-May 1888
-Robert Upton ,murder of wife, Oxford 17 July 1888
-Thomas Wyre, murder of son, Worcester 18-Jul 1888
-John Jackson, murder of warder, Webb Manchester 07-Aug 1888
-Arthur T Delaney, murder of wife, Derby 10-Aug 1888
-George Sargeant, murder of wife, Chelmsford 15-Aug 1888
-George N Daniels, murder, Birmingham 28-Aug 1888
-Harry B Jones murder Birmingham 28-Aug 1888
-Levi Richard Bartlett, murder of wife, Newgate 13-Nov 1888
-Samuel Crowther, murder of John Willis, Worcester 11-Dec 1888
-William Waddell, murder of woman, Durham 18-Dec 1888
-Charles Bulmer, murder of wife, Leeds 01-Jan 1889
-Thomas Clews, murder of woman, Stafford 01-Jan 1889
-George Nicholson, murder of wife, Warwick 08-Jan 1889
-William Gower and Charles Joseph Dobell murder of Bensley C Lawrence - Tunbridge Wells Maidstone 02-Jan 1889
-Ebenezer Samuel Jenkins, murder of his sweetheart, Wandsworth 06-Mar 1889
-Samuel Rylands, murder of little girl, Shepton Mallet gaol 13-Mar 1889
-Thomas Allen murder, of F G Kent, Swansea 10-Apr 1889
-John Witney, murder of wife, Bristol 11-Apr 1889
-George Horton, murder of little daughter, Derby 21-Aug 1889
-Benjamin Purnell, murder of wife, Devizes 09-Dec 1889
-William Dukes murder of Mr Gordon Bury 24-Dec 1889
-Robert West, and Frederick Brett, wife murder, Leeds 31-Dec 1889
-William Thomas Hook, wife murder, Maidstone 31-Dec 1889

If you look at the list you will see that few, if any, at first glance anyway, seem to have Madness as the compelling motive.
__________________
Michael Richards
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #940  
Old 10-20-2017, 05:06 PM
Pcdunn Pcdunn is offline
Chief Inspector
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 1,520
Default Tait as suspect?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Flynn View Post
He didn't SEE them, though, so how could he? For instance, it would support his argument that it was the same torso killer if he could have demonstrated that the saw-marks were identical, assuming such a forensic technique was available back then, which I doubt. Bearing that in mind, how could even the local police or doctors have passed definitive judgement as to the authorship of the crimes? And, as we know, no saws were used at all in the non-torso murders, so how could anyone - then or now - be absolutely sure that the same hand was behind those murders, still less make grand pronouncements that, not only was it the same hand, but that it "must have been" the hand of a butcher?

Tait is demonstrably speculating on what the wounds were like and who inflicted them, based on no direct involvement in the examinations at all. He was evidently an avid follower of the cases, almost certainly from reading about them in the papers. However, when we consider that no empirical, qualitative data as to the appearance of the wounds appeared in any press reports*, Tait's speculations are pretty much useless.

(*the best we get are adjectives like "jagged" or "deep", which don't help much.)
Probably a baseless speculation on my part, but could the pioneer founder of gynecological surgery have known so much about the torsos because he was responsible for them?
__________________
Pat D.
---------------
Von Konigswald: Jack the Ripper plays shuffleboard. -- Happy Birthday, Wanda June by Kurt Vonnegut, c.1970.
---------------
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.