Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ripper Facts

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Thanks Jerry

    just backs up what i said yesterday about how helpful you are

    Stevey

    Comment


    • Yes, thanks Jerry, very interesting.

      Comment


      • [QUOTE=Craig H;382347]

        I can see how Jack minimised blood stains on the earlier killings as he strangled them first so there was no spurting blood.
        Hi Craig,

        So you mean that he was cautious and actually aware of the risk of blood stains as a problem?

        How important do you consider this to have been for the killer and why?

        Regards, Pierre

        Comment


        • Hi Pierre

          I think your previous comments about him being a risk taker are right.

          However, also think he took the practical steps (does not mean he was very cautious) not to get much blood on him.

          The coroner's description of how he strangled the victims first to prevent blood spurting, and moved their bodies to certain positions in making his cuts, sounds to me like someone used to game hunting

          Craig

          Comment


          • Research update

            An update on where I'm up to .....

            I'm using Findmypast to search for all single men, who were lodgers, living in Whitechapel district for 1891 Census.

            This brings me to 830 people.

            The other assumption based from witness statements is he was not working class. Some people describe him as like a "clerk" and respectably dressed. If Marshall is valid, he heard the man say in an educated voice "you would say anything but your prayers"

            I'm also assuming that he had some surgical knowledge. The coroners - except for Bond - said the killer must have had surgical knowledge. I'm not thinking he had to be a doctor but could have been medically trained, a game hunter, a butcher, worked in a mortuary or similar.

            Again - realise assumptions may not be valid - some serial killers are married, he may have lived outside Whitechapel and people moved around a lot back then. However, I'm thinking he was not working class so may mean less transient.

            I'm aware 1891 Census in April was 2 1/2 years after the killings.

            The above assumptions will hopefully help me reduce the 830 list down to a smaller number.

            Again, may be a waste of time, but willing to see where it goes.

            Interested in others advice or guidance

            All the best

            Craig

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Craig H View Post
              An update on where I'm up to .....

              I'm using Findmypast to search for all single men, who were lodgers, living in Whitechapel district for 1891 Census.

              This brings me to 830 people.

              The other assumption based from witness statements is he was not working class. Some people describe him as like a "clerk" and respectably dressed. If Marshall is valid, he heard the man say in an educated voice "you would say anything but your prayers"

              I'm also assuming that he had some surgical knowledge. The coroners - except for Bond - said the killer must have had surgical knowledge. I'm not thinking he had to be a doctor but could have been medically trained, a game hunter, a butcher, worked in a mortuary or similar.

              Again - realise assumptions may not be valid - some serial killers are married, he may have lived outside Whitechapel and people moved around a lot back then. However, I'm thinking he was not working class so may mean less transient.

              I'm aware 1891 Census in April was 2 1/2 years after the killings.

              The above assumptions will hopefully help me reduce the 830 list down to a smaller number.

              Again, may be a waste of time, but willing to see where it goes.

              Interested in others advice or guidance

              All the best

              Craig

              Good luck, can't hurt.
              G U T

              There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

              Comment


              • Craig

                you may turn something up.
                worst case you have lots of research on people its not.

                At least you are doing some real work. good for you my friend.

                all the best

                steve




                Originally posted by Craig H View Post
                An update on where I'm up to .....

                I'm using Findmypast to search for all single men, who were lodgers, living in Whitechapel district for 1891 Census.

                This brings me to 830 people.

                The other assumption based from witness statements is he was not working class. Some people describe him as like a "clerk" and respectably dressed. If Marshall is valid, he heard the man say in an educated voice "you would say anything but your prayers"

                I'm also assuming that he had some surgical knowledge. The coroners - except for Bond - said the killer must have had surgical knowledge. I'm not thinking he had to be a doctor but could have been medically trained, a game hunter, a butcher, worked in a mortuary or similar.

                Again - realise assumptions may not be valid - some serial killers are married, he may have lived outside Whitechapel and people moved around a lot back then. However, I'm thinking he was not working class so may mean less transient.

                I'm aware 1891 Census in April was 2 1/2 years after the killings.

                The above assumptions will hopefully help me reduce the 830 list down to a smaller number.

                Again, may be a waste of time, but willing to see where it goes.

                Interested in others advice or guidance

                All the best

                Craig

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Elamarna View Post
                  Craig

                  you may turn something up.
                  worst case you have lots of research on people its not.

                  At least you are doing some real work. good for you my friend.

                  all the best

                  steve
                  What's more you will learn a lot about the people and the times.
                  G U T

                  There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

                  Comment


                  • No, Craig, it absolutely can't hurt. A lot of work though, and how do we know that he didn't live with very elderly relatives who didn't notice his comings and goings?

                    I do believe in the sighting of peaked hat man in Church Lane, actually. The timing is off but then people without watches often made a guess at the time. It would be reasonably logical for Jack to sit there in semi-darkness, contemplate his options and then move towards Whitechapel Highstreet, in search of more prey. What makes this sighting interesting is that before it was published only PC Smith's description of a suspect was being circulated.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Elamarna View Post
                      Craig

                      you may turn something up.
                      worst case you have lots of research on people its not.

                      At least you are doing some real work. good for you my friend.

                      all the best

                      steve
                      Hi Steve & GUT

                      Many thanks. Yes finding out a lot about job occupations in Whitechapel - not many IT Consulants or eCommerce Specialists !

                      Craig

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Rosella View Post
                        No, Craig, it absolutely can't hurt. A lot of work though, and how do we know that he didn't live with very elderly relatives who didn't notice his comings and goings?

                        I do believe in the sighting of peaked hat man in Church Lane, actually. The timing is off but then people without watches often made a guess at the time. It would be reasonably logical for Jack to sit there in semi-darkness, contemplate his options and then move towards Whitechapel Highstreet, in search of more prey. What makes this sighting interesting is that before it was published only PC Smith's description of a suspect was being circulated.
                        Hi Rosella

                        Yes - I think Church Lane sighting was Jack - you're right, it was early in news and previous witness description not published so not a case of making it up based upon others.

                        My concern is I'm thinking Whitechapel residents were mainly working class and I think Jack was not. Hopefully this will make someone stand out

                        All the best

                        Craig

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Craig H View Post
                          Hi Rosella

                          Yes - I think Church Lane sighting was Jack - you're right, it was early in news and previous witness description not published so not a case of making it up based upon others.

                          My concern is I'm thinking Whitechapel residents were mainly working class and I think Jack was not. Hopefully this will make someone stand out

                          All the best

                          Craig
                          The Church Lane sighting is a red herring. It may have been true, but given the number of men out and about in the late hours there's no reason to suppose it's Jack. Quite the opposite, in fact. Jack would not have stopped moving until he was in the City. He got no blood on his hands from killing Stride, so there'd have been no reason for him to stop and wipe his hands off. The man seen in Church Lane was likely a dock worker who, like James Brown, worked late and grabbed his supper at a chandler's shop.

                          Yours truly,

                          Tom Wescott

                          Comment


                          • As most of the "facts"come from newspaper reports a large pinch of salt is required.
                            Three things in life that don't stay hidden for to long ones the sun ones the moon and the other is the truth

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by pinkmoon View Post
                              As most of the "facts"come from newspaper reports a large pinch of salt is required.
                              Brampton solution to be revealed soon? Or was it all a big joke?

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
                                Brampton solution to be revealed soon? Or was it all a big joke?
                                Brampton? Wasn´t it the Grampton Solution?

                                One should not make jokes about serial murders. Or accuse dead people without proof.

                                Regards, Pierre

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X