Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Francis Spurzheim Craig

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Limehouse View Post
    Of course there's a chance, but most experts agree that the killer must have had a fairly good degree of local knowledge.
    Experts can be wrong, and what constitutes an expert in ripperology?

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Livia View Post
      We only have Elizabeth McCarthy's statement that she parceled
      up MJK's belongings and sent them to MJK's brother in the Scots
      Guards. If this is so, how is it that a fish knife was auctioned off
      at last year's conference, said to have formerly belonged to MJK
      and had been in the McCarthy family for years?

      There is a connection albeit tenuous, to the Scots Guards. The
      book states that both Anne Davies and her daughter Elizabeth
      worked for the Vane-Tempest family of Machynlleth. George
      Vane-Tempest, the master of the house, had a brother Adolphus
      who served with the Scots Fusilier Guards, which in 1877 by order
      of Victoria, became the Scots Guards.

      Edward and Anne Davies had no son named Henry. The only sons
      listed on the census records are George, Edward and John Weston
      Davies. It appears George may have died young, Edward was an
      apprentice chemist in 1871 and John Weston, a cabinet maker,
      married in 1891 and by 1911 was living in Wigan.
      Yes, you are correct in most of those points. George Vane-Temopest was perhaps better known as the Marquess of Londonderry, one of the richest men in Europe. Elizabeth and Anne named their eldest son George after him and their second daughter Mary (probably) after the Marchioness whose names were Mary Cornelia. George died in 1851 of tuberculosis. His body was still in the house when the census was taken. John Weston( my grandfather), always known in the family as Johnto, was a master cabinet maker at Maples and is recorded at the Victoria and Albert museum. They have a note saying that he 'left of his own accord' in 1891. After that he took to drink and drifted downwards until he became a simple carpenter. I believe it was guilt at not having taken better care of his sister that may have precipitated that.

      Wynne

      Comment


      • #63
        Wynne, had the family lost all contact with Elizabeth by 1888? After all, she was buried under a false name and under what was presumably the wrong religion.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
          Experts can be wrong, and what constitutes an expert in ripperology?

          www.trevormarriott.co.uk
          In my opinion, and it's a humble opinion, someone like Donald Rumbelow, who has an in-depth knowledge of the crimes but who does not offer a definitive theory about the identity of the killer.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Robert View Post
            Wynne, had the family lost all contact with Elizabeth by 1888? After all, she was buried under a false name and under what was presumably the wrong religion.
            Yes

            As far as I know they had. The last one to be in contact with her was her brother Johnto (my grandfather). All he told his son, my father (or at least all he passed on to me) was that she had been a prostitute in London and had 'come to a bad end.' I think he suspected the worst but couldn't quite bring himself to voice it. I think that Walter Sickert suspected something similar and years later alluded to it in the Mrs Barrett pictures.

            Wynne

            Comment


            • #66
              Thanks Wynne.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Prosector View Post
                Yes, you are correct in most of those points. George Vane-Temopest was perhaps better known as the Marquess of Londonderry, one of the richest men in Europe. Elizabeth and Anne named their eldest son George after him and their second daughter Mary (probably) after the Marchioness whose names were Mary Cornelia. George died in 1851 of tuberculosis. His body was still in the house when the census was taken. John Weston( my grandfather), always known in the family as Johnto, was a master cabinet maker at Maples and is recorded at the Victoria and Albert museum. They have a note saying that he 'left of his own accord' in 1891. After that he took to drink and drifted downwards until he became a simple carpenter. I believe it was guilt at not having taken better care of his sister that may have precipitated that.

                Wynne
                Thank you for your response.

                If George had died in 1851 and was still in the
                house during the census, this might explain
                why there was no age next to his name.

                From your response, I guess we can surmise
                that at least her brother John was aware of
                Elizabeth's fate and that this was family knowledge
                and was not something you've discovered in the
                course of your research.*

                Interesting.

                [*Posted after your response to Robert.]

                I've read the first few chapters and have seen
                your family tree at Ancestry. The lack of census
                records led me to speculate that it was created
                from family records more so than official ones.

                But there's one thing that I have not been able
                to confirm, and that is, where was Elizabeth in 1881?
                In the book you say that Elizabeth was Lady Vane's
                lady's maid before 1881, but Elizabeth does not appear
                on the 1881 census with the Vane-Tempests in Park Lane
                nor is she listed at the house in Machynlleth
                (listed as Londonderry House). She is not listed
                with her mother, who by this time has married
                David Evans (thanks for this Robert Linford) and
                is living in Clopie in 1881 and by 1891 Anne is living
                in Aberangell with husband David and daughter
                Margaret Davies.

                So without meaning to put you on the spot, do
                you know why Elizabeth does not appear where
                she should? Or do you know where she was in
                1881?

                Thanks again and I look forward to reading the
                rest of your book.

                Liv
                Last edited by Livia; 08-02-2015, 12:47 PM.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Prosector View Post
                  Yes

                  As far as I know they had. The last one to be in contact with her was her brother Johnto (my grandfather). All he told his son, my father (or at least all he passed on to me) was that she had been a prostitute in London and had 'come to a bad end.' I think he suspected the worst but couldn't quite bring himself to voice it. I think that Walter Sickert suspected something similar and years later alluded to it in the Mrs Barrett pictures.

                  Wynne
                  Hi
                  The quote "she came to a bad" end always amuses me. It is open to interpretation, obviously you believe it to be in the context of murder.

                  However it could also mean that she let herself go and finished up on the streets as a prostitute perhaps even homeless and was not murdered.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    The dates these murders were committed on tell me that our killer was visiting the area to commit these crimes also one question that always destroys a lot of "suspects" why did our killer stop I think he was either locked up or dead.
                    Three things in life that don't stay hidden for to long ones the sun ones the moon and the other is the truth

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by Livia View Post
                      Thank you for your response.

                      If George had died in 1851 and was still in the
                      house during the census, this might explain
                      why there was no age next to his name.

                      From your response, I guess we can surmise
                      that at least her brother John was aware of
                      Elizabeth's fate and that this was family knowledge
                      and was not something you've discovered in the
                      course of your research.*

                      Interesting.

                      [*Posted after your response to Robert.]

                      I've read the first few chapters and have seen
                      your family tree at Ancestry. The lack of census
                      records led me to speculate that it was created
                      from family records more so than official ones.

                      But there's one thing that I have not been able
                      to confirm, and that is, where was Elizabeth in 1881?
                      In the book you say that Elizabeth was Lady Vane's
                      lady's maid before 1881, but Elizabeth does not appear
                      on the 1881 census with the Vane-Tempests in Park Lane
                      nor is she listed at the house in Machynlleth
                      (listed as Londonderry House). She is not listed
                      with her mother, who by this time has married
                      David Evans (thanks for this Robert Linford) and
                      is living in Clopie in 1881 and by 1891 Anne is living
                      in Aberangell with husband David and daughter
                      Margaret Davies.

                      So without meaning to put you on the spot, do
                      you know why Elizabeth does not appear where
                      she should? Or do you know where she was in
                      1881?

                      Thanks again and I look forward to reading the
                      rest of your book.

                      Liv
                      Liv

                      I spent literally years trying to find Elizabeth in the 1881 census and examined hundreds of possible candidates throughout the UK. The most likely one is an Elizabeth Davies living in Park Street, Mayfair together with two other Welsh girls. She is described as a Lady's Maid, born North Wales (officially Merionethshire where Elizabeth was born was in North Wales) but her age is a little younger than Elizabeth's actual age (but she also did that in her marriage certificate). The other two girls are a cook and a housemaid. Park Street was just behind Londonderry House and often an aristocratic lady's personal servants (as opposed to household servants) lived separately from the rest of the servants. This ensured that tittle-tattle overheard in the lady's boudoir did not get discussed in the Servant's Hall.

                      To back this up I have also examined all of the Londonderry archives in the Durham Records Office. These include the household account books and servant records for Londonderry House at the time and it is clear that Lady Londonderry's own maid did not live in the house at the time although those of her daughters did.

                      Unless someone else can positively identify Elizabeth somewhere else I think that is the best candidate and, as her mother had also been Lady Londonderry's personal maid and was friendly with her during her life, I think it is the most likely identification.

                      Wynne

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
                        Hi
                        The quote "she came to a bad" end always amuses me. It is open to interpretation, obviously you believe it to be in the context of murder.

                        However it could also mean that she let herself go and finished up on the streets as a prostitute perhaps even homeless and was not murdered.

                        www.trevormarriott.co.uk
                        Totally agree. I have no idea what it meant but that is what he said. I am not suggesting that, of itself, it means that she was murdered.

                        Wynne

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by pinkmoon View Post
                          The dates these murders were committed on tell me that our killer was visiting the area to commit these crimes also one question that always destroys a lot of "suspects" why did our killer stop I think he was either locked up or dead.
                          Well there is also the possibility that, having achieved his end, there was no need to continue. Gain serial killers are documented as stopping once they achieve their objective. Read the literature.

                          Wynne
                          Last edited by Prosector; 08-02-2015, 03:14 PM. Reason: typo

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Prosector, thank you for answering questions on here.

                            Have you considered the possibility that Craig was only responsible for the murder of your relative, if she was the woman known as "Mary Kelly"?

                            I think your book sounds interesting, and plan to get it.
                            Pat D. https://forum.casebook.org/core/imag...rt/reading.gif
                            ---------------
                            Von Konigswald: Jack the Ripper plays shuffleboard. -- Happy Birthday, Wanda June by Kurt Vonnegut, c.1970.
                            ---------------

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Wynne, the Park St suggestion looks good. Just the servants there in 1881, and no one entitled to vote there around that time, as far as I can judge from the electoral rolls.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                What year was Elizabeth born again? Do the birth and marriage records agree on that? I have always suspected that Mary might have been older than she told everyone by maybe around 10 years.
                                This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.

                                Stan Reid

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X