Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A problem with the "Eddowes Shawl" DNA match

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by gnote View Post
    Weren't most of them inside the social club when the actual murder took place though?
    Anyone in the club potentially could have slipped into the yard, but it's very unlikely the killer went back into the club especially if he was bloody right?

    Comment


    • Originally posted by RockySullivan View Post
      Anyone in the club potentially could have slipped into the yard, but it's very unlikely the killer went back into the club especially if he was bloody right?
      Slashing her throat, coming back to the club and getting back into the festivities like nothing happened? Possible yes, but not likely.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by gnote View Post
        Weren't most of them inside the social club when the actual murder took place though?
        Yes but before the police arrived people had started to drift into the yard so when police arrived they took their names like I said before that list if it was ever to be found would make interesting reading we would probably be disappointed though.
        Three things in life that don't stay hidden for to long ones the sun ones the moon and the other is the truth

        Comment


        • Jari Posted Comment re: Shawl Research On Edwards' Site

          Hi everyone. There are new comments from Jari ron Russell Edwards' website. Dated 29 June 2015.

          The heading is: Shawl that nailed Polish Lunatic Aaron Kosminski and the Forensic expert that made the critical match



          Best regards,
          Archaic

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Archaic View Post
            Hi everyone. There are new comments from Jari ron Russell Edwards' website. Dated 29 June 2015.

            The heading is: Shawl that nailed Polish Lunatic Aaron Kosminski and the Forensic expert that made the critical match



            Best regards,
            Archaic
            He's still at it.
            G U T

            There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

            Comment


            • But I guess he has to recover what he spent somehow.
              G U T

              There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Archaic View Post
                Hi everyone. There are new comments from Jari ron Russell Edwards' website. Dated 29 June 2015.

                The heading is: Shawl that nailed Polish Lunatic Aaron Kosminski and the Forensic expert that made the critical match



                Best regards,
                Archaic
                Everything relating to the rarity of the Eddowes DNA (314.1c) has been deleted from the paperback and, as in this interview, the concentration is on the match with Kosminski's DNA, which they claim is 100%. They go on to state that having the DNA of both Eddowes and Kosminski on the same piece of material is pretty decisive (which I guess it would be), but I'm not sure how certain the Eddowes DNA match now is. It certainly seems to be played down.

                So, the emphasis is on the Kosminski DNA match.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by PaulB View Post
                  Everything relating to the rarity of the Eddowes DNA (314.1c) has been deleted from the paperback and, as in this interview, the concentration is on the match with Kosminski's DNA, which they claim is 100%. They go on to state that having the DNA of both Eddowes and Kosminski on the same piece of material is pretty decisive (which I guess it would be), but I'm not sure how certain the Eddowes DNA match now is. It certainly seems to be played down.

                  So, the emphasis is on the Kosminski DNA match.
                  Leaving out the 314.1c!!

                  Almost an admission huh????
                  G U T

                  There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

                  Comment


                  • The problem is that the DNA linked to Kosminski is MtDNA, haplogroup T1a1, which is a common subtype.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by John G View Post
                      The problem is that the DNA linked to Kosminski is MtDNA, haplogroup T1a1, which is a common subtype.
                      And of course they still have to link the rotten bit of rag to Kate and more particular her murder site.
                      G U T

                      There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

                      Comment


                      • Just found my previous post on this subject from last year. Kosminski is haplogroup T1a1 and around 2.17% of the population of England and Wales are mtDNA group T1. The subclade T1a1 represents about 80% of this total, giving a concentration of around 1.736%. That means about 94000 Londoner's, in 1888, would have shared Kosminski's mtDNA.
                        Last edited by John G; 07-04-2015, 12:16 AM.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by John G View Post
                          Just found my previous post on this subject from last year. Kosminski is haplogroup T1a1 and around 2.17% of the population of England and Wales are mtDNA group T1. The subclade T1a1 represents about 80% of this total, giving a concentration of around 1.736%. That means around 94000 Londoner's, in 1888, would have shared Kosminski's mtDNA.
                          And from that we jump to "It must be him".

                          And again no link to the bit of rag other than some vague family story.
                          G U T

                          There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by GUT View Post
                            And from that we jump to "It must be him".

                            And again no link to the bit of rag other than some vague family story.
                            The 'bit of rag' is a fairly substantial piece of printed silk. We may not like the claims being made, but that doesn't mean that things shouldn't be stated and described fairly.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by PaulB View Post
                              The 'bit of rag' is a fairly substantial piece of printed silk. We may not like the claims being made, but that doesn't mean that things shouldn't be stated and described fairly.
                              so nothing to link a fairly substantial bit of silk rag to the crime site other than a rather vague family story
                              G U T

                              There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

                              Comment


                              • I've just found the reference relating to genetic variability: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3376494/ As you can see, haplogroup T represents 2% of overall genetic variability in Western Europe, and 3% in Eastern Europe. And 80% of samples in the T1 tree fall within subclade T1a1. Document s2 gives the figures for the current genetic diversity per country. As you can see, the current concentration levels of haplogroup T1a1 in England are 1.8 %. Therefore, as a rough guide, the population of London was about 5.6 million in 1888, so 1.8% of that total would be about 100000 individuals.

                                Of course, as GUT points out, lack of provenance is a major problem: as a consequence we have no idea when the genetic material was deposited. I mean, it could have been in 1888, but presumably would be just as likely to be 1867, 1901, 1936...
                                Last edited by John G; 07-04-2015, 02:38 AM.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X