Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Poll: Organs/body parts removed or not?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by El White Chap View Post
    That's exactly why he worked for Bedfordshire and not the London Police force
    Reply meant for Harry D
    Last edited by Trevor Marriott; 07-20-2014, 09:33 AM.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Harry D View Post
      Wasn't it Dennis Rader who killed the Oteros, not Ridgway?
      Yes you are right thank you for pointing that out

      Comment


      • This is mere speculation, but maybe the Ripper got them in a necklock? Enough pressure in the right place and somebody is going down straight away. I have actually seen somebody do this to somebody. They went limp almost straight away, and he lowered them to the floor. They were out for a couple of seconds, dazed or temporarily unconscious.

        Comment


        • The killer's actual killing technique (as opposed to organ removal) is a separate discussion, surely? Unless someone's about to suggest that he strangled his victims whilst simultaneously removing parts of their body...
          Kind regards, Sam Flynn

          "Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)

          Comment


          • evidence

            Hello Trevor. Thanks.

            "But there is no evidence to show they didn't."

            Umm, not exactly preferred detective language?

            Cheers.
            LC

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Lechmere View Post
              Going straight for the throat with a knife, with a struggling and unsubdued woman, would be a recipe for disaster.
              Which is exactly what happened with McKenzie, and similarly with Stride, both hardly disasters from the killers perspective.
              If quick enough the victim goes into shock.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
                Nothing points to the killer being the remover of the organs at the crime scene
                Errrrrr so are we to also believe that asides from Kates missing Kidney, both the uteri of Kate and Annie were also removed by someone else other than the killer?

                What are the real chances in all plausible likelihood that these same organs were removed by someone other than the ripper from two different members of the C5 sometime during transit from murder scene to post mortem table?

                Once again, two uteri taken from two victims from what is strongly believed to be the same killer.

                You're seriously telling us that it's a coincidence?

                Come on out of fantasy land...

                Comment


                • Originally posted by El White Chap View Post
                  Errrrrr so are we to also believe that asides from Kates missing Kidney, both the uteri of Kate and Annie were also removed by someone else other than the killer?
                  Presumably this same weirdo nipped into 13 Miller's Court, and emptied Kelly's abdomen and half her chest cavity after the real killer had fled the scene.
                  Kind regards, Sam Flynn

                  "Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)

                  Comment


                  • When were Annie Chapman`s organs supposed to be removed, if not when she was murdered ?

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Jon Guy View Post
                      When were Annie Chapman`s organs supposed to be removed, if not when she was murdered ?
                      The answer being that the killer was the only person with the opportunity to remove the organs.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Jon Guy View Post
                        The answer being that the killer was the only person with the opportunity to remove the organs.
                        What a ridiculous statement !

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
                          What a ridiculous statement !
                          Ok, tell me who and when (or at least when) please ?

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
                            What a ridiculous statement !
                            Pot.Kettle.Black

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
                              Surely if you are intent on murder and you are brandishing a long blade knife which you subsequently use to cut the victims throat and then rip open the abdomen why not simply use the knife in the first instance.
                              For clarity, Trev, I’m not indulging in idle speculation when I say that the Ripper throttled his victims before cutting their throats, I’m citing the evidence that emerged through the postmortem and crime scene examinations. Swollen and protruding tongues, floridity in hand and neck tissues, clenched fists and so forth. Arterial jetting also proved beyond doubt that Chapman and Kelly were lying down as their throats were cut. Dr Brown said as much regarding Eddowes. The Ripper’s mode of attack might not make much sense to you, but it served him well. Eminently so given the fact that he escaped conviction.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
                                Are soldiers not taught how to kill swiftly and silently in that fashion and did I detect a hint of sarcasm in your reply?
                                That technique was not developed in the late 19th century.
                                Regards, Jon S.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X