Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Littlechild, Chief Inspector John George: Did Littlechild consider Dr. T a suspect for being a woman hater or for being gay? - by Jonathan H 15 minutes ago.
Elizabeth Stride: Was Stride Really a JtR Victim? - by Colin Roberts 44 minutes ago.
Elizabeth Stride: Was Stride Really a JtR Victim? - by Wickerman 1 hour and 5 minutes ago.
Mary Jane Kelly: was her killer really a local - by bolo 1 hour and 7 minutes ago.
Elizabeth Stride: Was Stride Really a JtR Victim? - by lynn cates 1 hour and 12 minutes ago.
Elizabeth Stride: Was Stride Really a JtR Victim? - by Wickerman 2 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Ripper Authors: The Evil Within - Trevor Marriott (moved discussion) - (20 posts)
General Discussion: The press, what they knew and how they knew it. - (12 posts)
Mary Jane Kelly: was her killer really a local - (11 posts)
Elizabeth Stride: Was Stride Really a JtR Victim? - (8 posts)
Mary Jane Kelly: Morganstone - (7 posts)
General Suspect Discussion: Jacob Levy - (6 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Dec 9, 2012, 4:59 pm
Donald Swanson
Edit: Chris
Dec 9, 2012, 3:40 pm
Louis Diemshitz
Edit: Robert Anderson
Nov 25, 2012, 8:43 pm
September 1888 Elizabeth Stride
Edit: Robert Anderson
Nov 24, 2012, 7:22 pm
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 21, 2012, 2:22 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: AMAZING HULL TOURS
June 17, 2013, 6:23 am.
Mike Covell: Research, Ripper, and Reader Printers.
June 14, 2013, 4:17 am.
Mike Covell: Jack the Ripper Tour in Hull:
June 1, 2013, 10:29 am.
Mike Covell: Lectures this week:
May 24, 2013, 8:48 am.
Mike Covell: New Research on Mary Jane Langley
February 8, 2013, 5:37 am.
Mike Covell: New file on Frederick Bailey Deeming found.
January 30, 2013, 2:11 pm.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Witnesses

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 04-22-2012, 04:52 PM
Premium Member
Hunter Hunter is offline
Inspector
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,182
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleetwood Mac View Post
Just a point on Swanson, it seems to me that Swanson is not simply repeating that which he was told. Comments such as "sent by us" suggests to me Swanson is including himself as one of those involved in the ID logistics. In the event he was relating a story, I'd imagine he would narrate from third person perspective.
Exactly. He was in charge of the investigation. While others came and went he was the one constant in the whole chain of the police investigation.

If it was just Anderson's call in all of this, it could be easy to dismiss his claims - knowing the caveats and controversy that surrounded him then, as well as now. But Swanson is a different story. He was a career policeman; had no aspirations compared to the patronage appointed officials above him, other than to finish out his career as a policeman. He wrote annotations in many manuscripts; he had done so in reports while on active duty.

Here, he is writing extensively and conclusively on a subject he certainly felt he knew something about. He felt he was filling in the blanks, not just repeating something he had heard. That some of the details are not clear to us is unfortunate. But I doubt he was considering posterity when he wrote it; no more than he did when he wrote annotations in other documents on other matters.
__________________
Best Wishes,
Hunter
____________________________________________

When evidence is not to be had, theories abound. Even the most plausible of them do not carry conviction- London Times Nov. 10.1888
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-22-2012, 05:00 PM
Jonathan H Jonathan H is offline
Chief Inspector
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 1,591
Default

It's because he was so efficient that I don't believe Swanson would have made the errors about 'Kosminski' being dead and that no other murders were committed after he was caged, as he himself investigated Coles as if it was a 'Jack' murder (and involving two hats, and so on).

I think he would have known the full name too (but Anderson was relying on Macnaghten).

To me Swanson sought clarification between the two, contradictory versions of Anderson, wrote it down because it was so, well, bizarre, and kept it to himself.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.