Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
General Suspect Discussion: Charles Lechmere interesting link - by Fisherman 1 minute ago.
General Suspect Discussion: News Flash!! . . . VINCENT VAN GOGH WAS JACK THE RIPPER!! - by GUT 3 hours ago.
General Suspect Discussion: News Flash!! . . . VINCENT VAN GOGH WAS JACK THE RIPPER!! - by TomTomKent 3 hours ago.
Mary Jane Kelly: MJK1, MJK2 and moving body - by Disco Stu 3 hours ago.
Catherine Eddowes: skill - by Barnaby 3 hours ago.
Mary Jane Kelly: MJK1, MJK2 and moving body - by Barnaby 4 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
General Discussion: PC Long, GSG & a Piece of Apron - (20 posts)
General Suspect Discussion: The "Suspects": Current Opinion - (11 posts)
General Suspect Discussion: News Flash!! . . . VINCENT VAN GOGH WAS JACK THE RIPPER!! - (10 posts)
General Suspect Discussion: Charles Lechmere interesting link - (7 posts)
Mary Jane Kelly: MJK1, MJK2 and moving body - (6 posts)
Catherine Eddowes: skill - (5 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Mar 6, 2014, 11:56 pm
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm
Donald Swanson
Edit: Chris
Dec 9, 2012, 3:40 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.
Mike Covell: A Study in Red – The Secret Journal of Jack the Ripper
March 3, 2014, 3:42 am.
Mike Covell: Almost there….
January 24, 2014, 4:05 am.
Mike Covell: Jack the Ripper - Year in Review 2013
December 28, 2013, 7:31 am.
Mike Covell: Jack the Ripper At Last? - Review
December 9, 2013, 2:08 am.
Mike Covell: From Whitechapel to Whitefriargate
November 27, 2013, 4:15 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Media > Audio -- Visual > Rippercast

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-14-2012, 04:46 AM
jmenges jmenges is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 825
Default Rippercast Ep. 52 'All Hope Abandoned': The Titanic Tragedy- Listener Questions

Hi all,

Rippercast will record its 52nd full-panel episode this Sunday, April 15th.

All Hope Abandoned: The Titanic Tragedy

with Titanic passenger researcher Ben Holme, filmaker and Titanic buff Justin Dombrowski, historian and editor of Ripperologist Chris George, historian, researcher and lecturer Mike Covell, and hopefully, my partner-in-podcast Ally Ryder.

I still think there is room for a passenger or two to sit in on this podcast so if you'd like to join the discussion, PM me before Sunday.

The show will record at 10am PCT, 1pm EST, 5pm GMT.

We will cover all aspects of the life of the RMS Titanic. From its construction to its maiden passengers, its sinking to its discovery and beyond, along with the passengers connections to the Whitechapel murders.

If listeners have any questions they would like to ask our panelists on the show, please have them either posted in this thread, PM'ed to me on Casebook, JtRForums, Facebooked to Jonathan Menges, Twittered @jmenges, or emailed to makhno9 at gmail.com.

Thanks for listening!

And Stay Tuned,



JM

Last edited by jmenges : 04-14-2012 at 05:06 AM.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-14-2012, 05:43 AM
Archaic Archaic is offline
Chief Inspector
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 1,788
Question Question

Hi Jon.

I have a question for your panel; or perhaps I should say an issue I'd like to hear discussed.

I was listening to a radio segment that discussed the fact that passengers aboard the Titanic stayed remarkably civil throughout their ordeal- and this despite the fact that there were too few lifeboats, the ship was sinking in the farthest reaches of the North Atlantic, the waters were deadly cold, and there was virtually no hope of rescue.
This phenomena was contrasted with the sinking of the Lusitania just 3 years later, whose passengers did panic and "fight for survival" after their ship was struck by a German torpedo.

I was mulling it over and trying to account for the different responses. It occurred to me that there might have been a different response between the two sets of passengers because the supposedly "unsinkable" Titanic struck an iceberg, which the passengers might have viewed as an "Act of God", whereas the Lusitania was sunk by a violent act of human beings.

But on the other hand, the Lusitania was much nearer to land and its passengers had a much better chance of being rescued by other boats, whereas the majority of the Titanic's passengers faced certain death.

What would your guests identify as the reasons that the reactions on the two ships were so different? What were the conditions that enabled passengers aboard the Titanic able to maintain their calm and let women and children board the lifeboats first?

- Was it actually the realization that they were facing certain death?

I'm looking forward to the podcast.

Thank you,
Archaic
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-14-2012, 05:53 AM
jmenges jmenges is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 825
Default

Thanks Bunny for your question which I will be sure to bring up on the podcast.

My first thought about it is this- that the panic on the Lusitania was in a part caused just because it happened after the sinking of the Titanic and its horrendous loss of life.

JM
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-14-2012, 06:52 AM
Archaic Archaic is offline
Chief Inspector
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 1,788
Default

Hi Jon, how are you?

I can certainly see your point there. I hadn't thought of that.

I was thinking that maybe the couple of hours it took the Titanic to sink gave people time to pray and "make their peace with God", and that contributed to the incredible calm and courage displayed by so many.

And I think the courage of many individuals, including the ship's band, in turned calmed and inspired others.

Thanks,
Archaic
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-14-2012, 11:27 AM
Phil Carter Phil Carter is offline
Assistant Commissioner
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,347
Default

Hello JM,

I have a question for Ben, perhaps all to discuss. It relates to the (fairly) recent investigation into the quality and the use of the rivets used in production and manufacture of the hull.

How do you regard this argument in regard to the relative ease of damage sustained?

Best wishes

Phil
__________________
Ten men went to mow...
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-14-2012, 04:45 PM
jmenges jmenges is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 825
Default

Thanks for your question, Phil.
I have a few 'rivet-counter' topics jotted down myself and will add yours to the discussion.

All the best.

JM
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-14-2012, 05:13 PM
jmenges jmenges is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 825
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaic View Post
Hi Jon, how are you?

I can certainly see your point there. I hadn't thought of that.

I was thinking that maybe the couple of hours it took the Titanic to sink gave people time to pray and "make their peace with God", and that contributed to the incredible calm and courage displayed by so many.

And I think the courage of many individuals, including the ship's band, in turned calmed and inspired others.

Thanks,
Archaic
It was not all rosy and standing around heroically, btw. Testimony at the inquiries (esp. that of Joseph Scarrott, A.B. on the Titanic) told of passengers rushing the lifeboats (specifically #14) and that he had to use "persuasion" to keep them back. Also we know of 5th officer Harold Lowe, who admitted to firing a gun three times to keep "a lot of Italians" from jumping into lifeboat #15 as it was being lowered down the side of the ship.

There was panic.

JM
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-14-2012, 11:06 PM
Phil Carter Phil Carter is offline
Assistant Commissioner
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,347
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmenges View Post
Thanks for your question, Phil.
I have a few 'rivet-counter' topics jotted down myself and will add yours to the discussion.

All the best.

JM
Hello JM,

there was an investigation done re the quality of the rivet material done and shown on either History channel or Discovery a few yeas ago (I cant remember which)
the conclusion being that the poor quality and spacing used (cost saving) had a detremental effect on the hull being so easily ripped apart. Forgive me for scant details, am going on memory!
Good luck with the programme!

Best wishes

Phil
__________________
Ten men went to mow...
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-15-2012, 05:42 AM
Archaic Archaic is offline
Chief Inspector
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 1,788
Question Human Remains? / Graveyard vs. Salvage?

Hi Jon. I have a few more questions for you. They're related to the subject of human remains.

We've all seen the touching photos of pairs of leather shoes lying on the seabed, marking the place where a human body came to rest.
In those cases all flesh and bone appears to be gone now, but-

1. Does your panel believe there are still human remains within the ruins of Titanic? Is it physically possible that some kind of very small partial human remains might still be inside the ship, perhaps locked within a passenger cabin or inside some kind of hatch?


I heard a story- I don't know if it's true- that a salvage expedition picked up a gold ring from the sand of the sea-floor, only to discover that there was still a human finger-bone inside. It's said they immediately re-buried the ring and the bone in the sand and left that area.

2.Does your panel know if this story is true? Would sand preserve a bone at those depths?


3.Do the members of your panel feel, like Bob Ballard, that the Titanic is a "graveyard" and conducting any kind of 'salvage' operation desecrates it and should be forbidden by international law? Or do they feel that it's better to bring up artifacts in order to learn from them and preserve them for history?

Thanks very much Jon, and my thanks to your guests. I'm really looking forward to the podcast!
Archaic

Last edited by Archaic : 04-15-2012 at 05:51 AM.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-15-2012, 06:26 AM
Archaic Archaic is offline
Chief Inspector
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 1,788
Question Remains of a Titanic Passenger?

Hi Jon.

This is the photo that got me thinking about the possibility of human remains... maybe a few teeth, or maybe something more.

The photo appears to show the shoe and garments of one of Titanic's passengers who came to rest on the sea-floor.

The shoe-leather has been preserved all these years because it's tanned. If the large dark matter above the shoe is truly a garment, I'm thinking it must have been either a tanned leather coat or something like a heavily-treated oil-skin coat.

I have no idea if a bit of organic human material could have been preserved under it, embedded in the silt.

I find this photo very poignant and thought-provoking.

Thanks,
Archaic
Attached Images
 
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.