
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |

04-14-2012, 01:25 AM
|
|
Commisioner
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,945
|
|
Question about distance and time
I'm seeking opinions in this thread, more than hard facts. I haven't done any walking or jogging in years, so I'd appreciate some feedback from those who do. In the case of Emma Smith, we have Margaret Hames seeing her on the corner of Farrant and Burdett Road in the Limehouse district at approximately 12:15am. Smith is with a man, almost certainly a potential client. Smith claimed later that at approximately 1:30am she was attacked by the men near 10 Brick Lane, approximately two miles away by my (amateur) calculations. I'm also quite aware that neither Hames nor Smith would have had time pieces on them, rendering their estimates less than dependable, but that is why I'm asking this question.
We can assume that Smith didn't take off for home right after Hames past her, or else she would have caught up with her. Let's give her 10 minutes to service her last client and be on her way. That would leave us with Smith departing from Farrant Street at approx. 12:25am.
Here's my question: Is it reasonable to suppose that a 45 year old inebriated woman, walking in the dark, could have covered 2 miles in 65 minutes?
Yours truly,
Tom Wescott
|

04-14-2012, 01:56 AM
|
|
Assistant Commissioner
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,202
|
|
I don't think serious walkers or joggers are going to be of much help, Smith was neither.
You need an opinion from a drinker  but how many drinkers today walk further than their car?
Seriously, ...2 miles in 1 hour? is not impossible, thats about all that can be safely determined.
How drunk was she? how much did it slow her down?
You need a drinker who walks two miles after a night on the ale..
Regards, Jon S.
__________________
Regards, Jon S.
It can scarcely be doubted that the same person who murdered several poor women in August and September in Whitechapel has returned to his old haunts, and been again at his hideous work. Two such monsters in human form there cannot be. The murderer of Mitre-square is, no doubt, the murderer of Dorset-street.
Times, 10 Nov. 1888.
|

04-14-2012, 02:12 AM
|
|
Chief Inspector
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: West Sussex UK
Posts: 1,969
|
|
Hi Tom
Shtone cold shober I can do between 4 and 5 mph and I'm in my late 50s and (hic) I've a f'her, oh shih, heart condition...
Now elephants I shpose it depends on if I'm walkin shtrate or not...but if I'm "goodnight old ****" shober, I'd guess 2 miles in an hour is a piece of piss (shorry cake)....
Yours inebri...inebriate...pished
Dave
|

04-14-2012, 02:30 AM
|
|
Commisioner
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,945
|
|
Hi Dave, better put a security code on your computer, it seems Jeff Leahy has hijacked it!
Yours truly,
Tom Wescott
|

04-14-2012, 02:31 AM
|
|
Superintendent
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Paris/Berlin/Chicago
Posts: 2,988
|
|
Well, my mom (who's in her late 60s) and I made 1 mile in about half an hour walking from a beach to another town on a country road in Greece last fall, and neither of us was drunk. :-) I was walking slow enough to accommodate her, and in my perception she's a real slow walker.
PS:. Question is, who can put more booze away. Pirate Jack or Cap'tn Jack?
__________________
Best regards,
Maria
Last edited by mariab : 04-14-2012 at 02:33 AM.
|

04-18-2012, 01:17 PM
|
|
Commisioner
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: London
Posts: 4,413
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom_Wescott
I'm seeking opinions in this thread, more than hard facts. I haven't done any walking or jogging in years, so I'd appreciate some feedback from those who do. In the case of Emma Smith, we have Margaret Hames seeing her on the corner of Farrant and Burdett Road in the Limehouse district at approximately 12:15am. Smith is with a man, almost certainly a potential client. Smith claimed later that at approximately 1:30am she was attacked by the men near 10 Brick Lane, approximately two miles away by my (amateur) calculations. I'm also quite aware that neither Hames nor Smith would have had time pieces on them, rendering their estimates less than dependable, but that is why I'm asking this question.
We can assume that Smith didn't take off for home right after Hames past her, or else she would have caught up with her. Let's give her 10 minutes to service her last client and be on her way. That would leave us with Smith departing from Farrant Street at approx. 12:25am.
Here's my question: Is it reasonable to suppose that a 45 year old inebriated woman, walking in the dark, could have covered 2 miles in 65 minutes?
Yours truly,
Tom Wescott
|
Tom,
I think London then was virtually a 24 hour city and that between Limehouse and Whitechapel there would have been trams along the main highway.I know trams were being put in in Commercial Street at that time.
Norma
|

04-18-2012, 04:41 PM
|
|
Commisioner
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,945
|
|
Hi Nats, that's a new one on me.
Yours truly,
Tom Wescott
|

04-18-2012, 05:29 PM
|
|
Superintendent
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,955
|
|
Hi All,
Dependent on their route, London trams started running between 7.00 and 8.00 am, and continued throughout the day until between 10.30 and 11.45pm.
The Commercial Street tramway was opened on 15th November 1888.
Regards,
Simon
__________________
Fidiamo in Legno
|

04-18-2012, 06:13 PM
|
|
Commisioner
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: London
Posts: 4,413
|
|
Thanks Simon---they definitely had cabs of course---and the omnibus-but maybe the omnibus stopped when the trams stopped-unless they had a night one like today's night buses!
Cheers
Norma
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:27 PM.
|
 |
 |
|