Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
General Discussion: Whitechapel... the land of wackos - by perrymason 1 minute ago.
Ripperologist: Ripperologist 108 - by Tom_Wescott 4 minutes ago.
General Discussion: "Site" unseen? - by perrymason 13 minutes ago.
General Discussion: Whitechapel... the land of wackos - by protohistorian 15 minutes ago.
Ripper Authors: James Stetler - The Book That Never Was - by sudden_death 22 minutes ago.
General Discussion: Fishing for answers: A Net? - by perrymason 23 minutes ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Witnesses: Schwartz and Brown - (48 posts)
General Discussion: Why Women? - (13 posts)
General Discussion: "Site" unseen? - (10 posts)
Kelly, James: Jack the Ripper in America - (10 posts)
General Discussion: Who Are We? - (9 posts)
Mary Jane Kelly: Did Astracan kill Mary Kelly - (8 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Timothy Killeen
Edit: John Bennett
Nov 13, 2009, 7:48 am
Stephen White
Edit: John Bennett
Nov 11, 2009, 10:28 am
George Hutchinson
Edit: John Bennett
Nov 11, 2009, 10:20 am
The Bell
Edit: John Bennett
Nov 11, 2009, 10:19 am
William Steer
Edit: John Bennett
Nov 11, 2009, 10:18 am

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: My Ripper Book of the Week 19
October 30, 2009, 5:59 am.
Mike Covell: Winter Lectures - The Publicity
October 30, 2009, 5:51 am.
Mike Covell: Pompadour Cosmetiques Files
September 25, 2009, 10:21 am.
Mike Covell: Recent Findings
September 23, 2009, 7:37 am.
Mike Covell: The Hull Connection Lecture 08/12/09
September 23, 2009, 7:27 am.
Mike Covell: Inspector Thomas Roots Found!!!
September 9, 2009, 9:43 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Letters and Communications > From Hell (Lusk) Letter

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old 11-17-2009, 08:19 PM
Chris Chris is online now
Inspector
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,156
Default

smezenen

Just to clarify, I am not so much basing my interpretation on the fact that these final upstrokes appear, as explaining how the upstroke can make "Sir" look like "Sor".

The overwhelming argument for the "Sir" interpretation is simply that "Sir" - not "Sor" - is precisely the word we should expect to see in that position.

Thank you for explaining what you meant by the upstroke. However, in that case I really don't understand the point. Surely in joined-up handwriting one can't assume a stroke is a continuation of the same letter because there is no break in the line?
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 11-18-2009, 11:13 AM
smezenen smezenen is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: west coast, USA
Posts: 300
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris View Post
smezenen

Just to clarify, I am not so much basing my interpretation on the fact that these final upstrokes appear, as explaining how the upstroke can make "Sir" look like "Sor".

The overwhelming argument for the "Sir" interpretation is simply that "Sir" - not "Sor" - is precisely the word we should expect to see in that position.

Thank you for explaining what you meant by the upstroke. However, in that case I really don't understand the point. Surely in joined-up handwriting one can't assume a stroke is a continuation of the same letter because there is no break in the line?
I agree that Sir is the word you or I would expect to see there but given that the author has spelled some words phonetically with accent, he may have misspelled this word as in Kidne for kidney, prasarved for preserved, nise for nice, tother for the other, knif for knife, wate for wait, and whil for while. Sor for Sir would be phoneticaly correct if the writer is trying to fake an accent.

Of these examples two of his misspellings convince me the writer was trying to fake an accent. He spells knife as knif when phonetically it should have been nife and while as whil when it should have been wile. The other thing that convinces me that the writer is faking an accent is the fact that we never hear our own accent. For example talk to someone from Alabama or Georgia (my wife) and metion their accent and they will tell you they dont have one and that you are the one with the accent.
__________________
“People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf” George Orwell.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.