Originally Posted by Elamarna
Look forward to reading your take on things. My issue is why would being told he was wanted my another officer exonerate him from a failure to take down basic details? And if it doesn't, why not give a version closer to the truth?
on the first issue, if he was told another policeman had sent them , he could reasonably assume that such details ha d already been taken.
However there is more to the argument than simply not taking of names.
The press could have made his life very bad, if the version i hold to had come out.