No actually it is a perfect example of hijacking because: This thread is not about minutia of cuts or medical slicings. It was only mentioned as an example in a broader topic. Gareth was only giving a medical example as part of an illustration of an overall point of a broader topic that has nothing at all to do with who or how anything was sliced and diced. You seized on one small part of an argument to shove in and promote something that's near and dear to your pet theory: the ridiculous idea of rogue morgue attendants or students or whatever carving up the victims after the fact.
Hijacking a thread because of theory bias. Seeing one small part, where you could wedge in with your pet theory.
Thank you, for this fine illustrative opportunity.
Let all Oz be agreed;
I'm Wicked through and through.