Originally Posted by Kattrup
1894 states: The skin and much of the muscular tissue, not, however, exposing the bone, had been slashed away from the anterior
aspect of the thighs as far as the knees [my bolding, Kattrup]
1888 claims cut to the bone, 1894 claims NOT cut to the bone.
Can it not be clearly seen in the MJK photograph that the thigh bone is exposed and thus removed of all flesh?