Originally Posted by DirectorDave
I'm not overly familiar with this case but I have watched a documentary recently which it said they only had a partial DNA sample from the envelopes, which means you can rule certain people out but not conclusively rule someone as a match.
And that is a match for the persons saliva that is on the envelope, not necessarily the killer.
My info may be out of date or inaccurate, could anyone who knows a little more about the case confirm if the above is true?
Yes. Iím a tad dubious of the dna evidence as were talking 1969. So early in the science.
Allen IMHO was probably the zodiac. Iím about 80% convinced.