Originally Posted by Observer
Hey doesn't the Diary include a decidedly obscure poem?
Obscure poem, details found in books by an author Barrett was reading, items worded the same as it is in lists published a century later, out-of-date phrases and pubs, conflicting handwriting to May's actual known hand, etc.
But hey, the ink was shown to be old, by at least one source, we can just forget the other source which claimed the ink was capable of being modern.
It's all about picking and choosing what we fancy believing, that's how stuff works, afterall. Oh, wait, it isn't.
Evidence for it being genuine? Anyone?
Is that a tumbleweed?