Casebook Forums

Casebook Forums (http://forum.casebook.org/index.php)
-   Motive, Method and Madness (http://forum.casebook.org/forumdisplay.php?f=123)
-   -   GSG xmas present (http://forum.casebook.org/showthread.php?t=10039)

Pierre 12-22-2016 07:23 AM

GSG xmas present
 
Hi everyone,

I have promised you a xmas present. With this present I hope that the GSG will be much clearer to all here.

The present has four parts (you may think it has more).

One is a new source.

One is the explanation for the GSG.

One is the motive for killing all the victims.

One is the explanation for the double negative in the GSG.

1. I have found a new document produced by an institution and it is in an archive in Britain.

In this document there are two lies. One is not being presented here since it is giving an ID connected to the data from the Whitechapel murders.

The other lie which is to be presented to you here is:

The person giving the data in this source told those who produced the source that he was a judge although he was not.

It is clearly written and visible.

There is an external function for the whole document which explains how it is connected to the Whitechapel murders.

There are also many sources which have a high explanatory value for the motive behind the GSG.

2. I will now give you the explanation for the GSG:

There was a very serious threat against him from the judges on the 1st and 2nd October. There is another original source from an archive stating this.

He wanted to stop them. There is another original source from an archive stating that.

There are several sources showing that:

There was a trial against him.

He was blamed.

He did not accept it.

He was very shamed.

One person knew that he was trying to stop the process and the communication is directed to him. There is more communication throughout the case and it is always directed to the same person.

On the night of the double event the killer knew what was going to happen on the 1st and 2nd October.

To stop the judicial process against him he wrote on the wall in Goulston Street:

The judges are not the men that will be blamed for nothing.

He took it upon himself to act like a judge in his own cause:

He was not the "judge" who would be blamed for nothing. He claimed that he was innocent.

(But he was guilty, there is a source for this).

3. The victims, all of them, were killed to make the procedure against him stop.

That was the paramount motive of the killer.


The murder of Stride was for the threat against him on 1st October, the murder of Eddowes was for the threat against him on 2nd October.

The judges are not the men that will be blamed for nothing.

= The judges at court were the men that were to be blamed for something: They were to be blamed for the murders.

If they stopped the procedure, the murders would stop.

4. The reason for the double negative is the two aspects of blame on judges:
the blame on the killer who acted as a judge in his own cause and the blame on the real judges.

When the murders stopped after Pinchin Street 1889, the judges had stopped the procedure.

I have some work to do but will read your comments and also respond later.

I wish you all a very Merry Xmas.

Best wishes, Pierre

Abby Normal 12-22-2016 07:54 AM

I hope you saved the gift receipt, because I would like to return it

Elamarna 12-22-2016 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 403913)
Hi everyone,

I have promised you a xmas present. With this present I hope that the GSG will be much clearer to all here.

The present has four parts (you may think it has more).

One is a new source.

One is the explanation for the GSG.

One is the motive for killing all the victims.

One is the explanation for the double negative in the GSG.

1. I have found a new document produced by an institution and it is in an archive in Britain.

In this document there are two lies. One is not being presented here since it is giving an ID connected to the data from the Whitechapel murders.

The other lie which is to be presented to you here is:

The person giving the data in this source told those who produced the source that he was a judge although he was not.

It is clearly written and visible.

There is an external function for the whole document which explains how it is connected to the Whitechapel murders.

There are also many sources which have a high explanatory value for the motive behind the GSG.

2. I will now give you the explanation for the GSG:

There was a very serious threat against him from the judges on the 1st and 2nd October. There is another original source from an archive stating this.

He wanted to stop them. There is another original source from an archive stating that.

There are several sources showing that:

There was a trial against him.

He was blamed.

He did not accept it.

He was very shamed.

One person knew that he was trying to stop the process and the communication is directed to him. There is more communication throughout the case and it is always directed to the same person.

On the night of the double event the killer knew what was going to happen on the 1st and 2nd October.

To stop the judicial process against him he wrote on the wall in Goulston Street:

The judges are not the men that will be blamed for nothing.

He took it upon himself to act like a judge in his own cause:

He was not the "judge" who would be blamed for nothing. He claimed that he was innocent.

(But he was guilty, there is a source for this).

3. The victims, all of them, were killed to make the procedure against him stop.

That was the paramount motive of the killer.


The murder of Stride was for the threat against him on 1st October, the murder of Eddowes was for the threat against him on 2nd October.

The judges are not the men that will be blamed for nothing.

= The judges at court were the men that were to be blamed for something: They were to be blamed for the murders.

If they stopped the procedure, the murders would stop.

4. The reason for the double negative is the two aspects of blame on judges:
the blame on the killer who acted as a judge in his own cause and the blame on the real judges.

When the murders stopped after Pinchin Street 1889, the judges had stopped the procedure.

I have some work to do but will read your comments and also respond later.

I wish you all a very Merry Xmas.

Best wishes, Pierre



Actually Pierre, apart from the dates I had sort of guessed all that you posted, drawing on much of what you have previously posted.

The only thing missing is a reference to "Helen" who ever she was!

And UNFORTUNATELY it takes nothing any further forward.

Again we have claimed, undisclosed sources from unnamed archives, no details which is what i specifically requested earlier in the week.


I try and be fair to you as much as possible, but the post will achieve nothing other than to wind people up I fear.

Its a bit like opening the box to find it empty.

No other comments as there is nothing to comment on!




Steve

jerryd 12-22-2016 09:23 AM

Pierre,

You have critiqued a document and interpreted it the way you think it reads. You have not provided the source for anyone else to do the same. Are we supposed lay down and agree with you on those terms? The historical sources all say the word on the wall was in some form or fashion 'Jews'. Not judges. Where do you draw the line for what historical sources are correct and incorrect? Only when it fits into your theory? You have done nothing to change the status quo.

Harry D 12-22-2016 09:39 AM

I would've preferred a scalextric...

David Orsam 12-22-2016 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Abby Normal (Post 403917)
I hope you saved the gift receipt, because I would like to return it

Did you actually receive Pierre's xmas present then Abby?

I appear to be still waiting for it.

I know it can't be that incomprehensible waffle in the OP which I assume is just the boring prelude to actual exciting gift.

I'm guessing he's sent the present round by PM so if you can forward it on to me that would be great, thanks.

Michael W Richards 12-22-2016 11:25 AM

I dont recall seeing any authority figure writing down what was written on the wall as "judges", nor do I any dips in the recorded versions that would substantiate a "g" interpretation.

Pierre 12-22-2016 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elamarna (Post 403918)
Actually Pierre, apart from the dates I had sort of guessed all that you posted, drawing on much of what you have previously posted.

The only thing missing is a reference to "Helen" who ever she was!

And UNFORTUNATELY it takes nothing any further forward.

Again we have claimed, undisclosed sources from unnamed archives, no details which is what i specifically requested earlier in the week.


I try and be fair to you as much as possible, but the post will achieve nothing other than to wind people up I fear.

Its a bit like opening the box to find it empty.

No other comments as there is nothing to comment on!

Steve

Hi Steve,

And what do you think about the source I have presented to you?

Regards, Pierre

David Orsam 12-22-2016 11:32 AM

I'm seeing mention in this thread to a "source".

Where do I find this source?

And when are we going to get our xmas present?

Pierre 12-22-2016 11:42 AM

QUOTE=jerryd;403925

Quote:

Pierre,

You have critiqued a document and interpreted it the way you think it reads. You have not provided the source for anyone else to do the same. Are we supposed lay down and agree with you on those terms?
Jerry,

You are not supposed to do anything at all.

Quote:

The historical sources all say the word on the wall was in some form or fashion 'Jews'. Not judges.
The first source in the source hierachy gave "Juwes". There is no evidence for a killer having any problem with "Juwes".

Quote:

Where do you draw the line for what historical sources are correct and incorrect? Only when it fits into your theory?
I draw the line when there are too many sources pointing to the killer and when these sources at the same time give motive explanations as well as functional and causal explanations. Then I have to rule out "chance". There is nothing else to do.

Regards, Pierre


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.