Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New info on Toppy !!!?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • New info on Toppy !!!?

    I had some time to waste yesterday, and decided to go nosing round the
    net looking for some info for a new thread that I'm planning...and I came across this web site :-victorianripper.niceboard.net

    I don't quite know if it is all to be believed but the 'facts' given are so concrete that they can be independently verified. If all this info is truth, then it certainly opens up a new area to be investigated ! I am certainly excited by the implications...

    First of all, the author of the posts on Hutchinson claims to be in contact with a member of the Donald family, who is a descendant of Toppy. This is a photo of Toppy's elder sister, Jane and her info (note the Essex connection).
    (see attachements)Emily Jane HUTCHINSON
    Born: 26 April 1861, Hornchurch, Essex
    Marriage: James KNOTT on 4 April 1886 in Lewisham, Kent
    Died: 10 November 1932, Hadleigh, Essex aged 71
    Buried: 15 November 1932, Hadleigh Churchyard, Hadleigh, Essex

    Astonishingly, the author ("Karen") makes this assertion :
    "George Hutchinson Onboard The Ophir
    After discovering that George Hutchinson was travelling from Australia to London and back again, I began studying passenger lists and found something that may be of interest to my readers:

    A George Hutchinson, born in 1866 and listed as a labourer, was onboard the Ophir leaving London for Sydney Australia in 1894.

    Name: George HUTCHINSON
    Date of departure: 21 September 1894
    Port of departure: London
    Passenger destination port: Sydney, Australia
    Passenger destination: Sydney, Australia
    Date of Birth: 1866 (calculated from age)
    Age: 28
    Marital status: Single
    Sex: Male
    Occupation: Labr
    Passenger recorded on: Page 7 of 13
    Ship: OPHIR
    Official Number: 0
    Master's name: J F Ruthven
    Steamship Line:
    Where bound: Sydney, Australia
    Square feet: 6833
    Registered tonnage: 6910
    Passengers on voyage: 389

    Here is another interesting one:

    Name: Geo HUTCHINSON
    Date of departure: 19 January 1912
    Port of departure: London
    Passenger destination port: Adelaide, Australia
    Passenger destination: Adelaide, Australia
    Date of Birth:
    Age:
    Marital Status: Single
    Sex: Male
    Occupation: Labourer
    Passenger recorded on: Page 5 of 32
    Ship: ORVIETO
    Official Number: 129628
    Master: W S Shelford
    Steamship Line: Orient
    Where bound: Australia
    Square feet: 14466
    Registered tonnage: 7421
    Passengers on voyage: 1011

    Here are a couple more passenger records of a George Hutchinson sailing from London to Australia:" (follows more dates from 1920s)

    Note: this concerns Toppy, and his occupation is given as 'labourer'.
    I imagine that 'Karen' was pointed in the direction of Australia by her Toppy family contact. This begs the question that IF Hutch & Toppy are one
    (and I've never doubted it) -was he travelling abroad between 1888 and 1894? Are there any ripper type crimes in Australia or NZ to be found ? Is this one reason why the murders stopped in London ?

    Karen shows a picture of a George Hutchinson who patented a mechanical milking machine in New Zealand in 1906 (see attachements) and asks if is this Toppy aged 40 ?

    "I found the photo on the left while looking through some newspaper archives in New Zealand. This is a photo of a Mr. George Hutchinson who invented a new cow-milking machine. I placed the photo of George Hutchinson, supplied by his son Reginald Hutchinson, beside it for comparison and I must say, that I see a great deal of similiarities in the shape of the eyebrows and eyes, the same thickness of the bottom lip, the same moustache and the very same look about the eyes.

    Source: Progress, Volume I, Issue 9, 2 July 1906, Page 24

    Here is the article in its entirety http://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/cgi...chinson%22-all

    I also found the patent information at the CIPO (Canadian Intellectual Property Office) and the info can be found at these links:





    http://patents.ic.gc.ca/cipo/cpd/en/...&start=1&num=5 "

    It certainly looks like it to me ! Furthermore if we consider that Hutchinson might have been a groom, from a rural background, who ended up a plumber, then him inventing a 'milking machine' seems less whacky (as opposed to if he were just a 'labourer').
    Attached Files
    Last edited by Rubyretro; 06-17-2010, 07:50 AM.
    http://youtu.be/GcBr3rosvNQ

  • #2
    I just want to add that I have now read that the Hutchinson who invented
    the milking machine is described as "late of Wellington College"...so on the face of it, doesn't appear to be the same person at all.

    Still -the physical ressemblence is striking....

    I'm not convinced, but it was too late to edit the previous post..
    http://youtu.be/GcBr3rosvNQ

    Comment


    • #3
      Beware

      No this site is run by the infamous Trenouth aka KK or Krazy Karen. She has these most fantastical ideas which if you don't accept as fact she starts throwing her toys out of her pram.

      She doesn't actaully conduct research just has an idea and then spends hours on the internet trying to find information to bolster her idea.


      "Beware the Karenwock, my son!
      The jaws that bite, the claws that catch!
      Beware the Jubjub bird, and shun
      The frumious Bandersnatch!"

      Its quite sad really as she has what most of us would really like, the time and the ability to spend hours on the internet conducting research, instead she just throws it all away on nonsense.

      Comment


      • #4
        I noticed that you were a member Bob !

        What 'crazy ideas' does she have ?? Well, the New Zealand link was one -but she only gave her opinion on the ressemblence of the photos, which was
        self evidently true, and she had the honesty to print the whole article with no other comment, so we can form our own opinion. I think that it was worth showing.

        she reproduces alot of newspaper articles and documents, with their references and doesn't add much herself.

        Do you think that she baldly made up the bit about Toppy's family and/or the trips to Australia ? Or altered the birthdate & occupation on the tickets ? She could have done -but presumably they can be verified. If they are true than they are very interesting.

        I don't see any other way of making a breakthrough in this case, other than forming a theory and testing it against evidence. I'd say that most people on
        Casebook have their own theory -and whether it's crazy or not is subjective since no one knows the real answers. There must be a mine of information
        available on the net, if only addresses and references to organisms to contact, and just because they did their research by computer rather than legwork, doesn't make it less valuable. You've got to start from a theory to have an idea on what direction to do your research to have a hope of turning up new evidence. And I think that there is new evidence still to be turned up; Karen might be the person to do it.

        I'm keeping an open mind about her, anyway -it's just silly to dismiss her out of hand. There are just loads of people on Casebook who start "throwing their toys out of the pram" when you disagree with their convictions..that doesn't mean that they're mad.
        http://youtu.be/GcBr3rosvNQ

        Comment


        • #5
          Sorry Bob ! -I've now seen her 'previous' (now we understand why juries aren't supposed to know about other crimes).

          Yes...well, a quintet of gay aristocrats and an eminent surgeon involved in black magic certainly fit my idea of 'mad'..

          'Hutch the killer-groom' is actually quite sober compared to that !
          http://youtu.be/GcBr3rosvNQ

          Comment


          • #6
            Well

            Basically what she does is input a name, in this case George Hutchinson and anything that pops up on the internet is THE George Hutchinson. She then presents this as fact. All this twaddle about going to Australia is I am sure quite correct for A George Hutchinson but she refuses to accept there were more than one!

            She claimed to have found the married details of Mary Kelly and Davies, but when I checked them I found it was just a person named Davies who married someone named Kelly. I actually posted all this on the boards and she still refused to believe she was in the wrong.

            She did the same with another favourite of hers Alfred Pearson. She absolutely refused to accept that the one she was pushing had nothing to do with the case.

            Comment


            • #7
              You have convinced me, Bob..

              Still the 'Australia' Hutch ...could be the right one

              I would be more convinced if I knew that she was pointed in that direction by
              the descendant of Toppy (I've left her a question, but as she's an author, I think that she's a bit 'protectionist' of her research as well).

              I expect that SOME of her research is correct -but how to sort the chaff from the wheat ????
              http://youtu.be/GcBr3rosvNQ

              Comment


              • #8
                She's not an author and she's not a researcher. Three-quarters of her book were copied and pasted directly from the Casebook. She's a loon. That is all.

                Let all Oz be agreed;
                I need a better class of flying monkeys.

                Comment


                • #9
                  So...only 'chaff ' then ??...????????....?
                  http://youtu.be/GcBr3rosvNQ

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Sorry to say theres not much wheat in these cases. Therefore it seems some people have to find chaff and try to turn it ti wheat. This has been going on since the first day the cases became sensational and most likely before that!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Hutch or not

                      Originally posted by Rubyretro View Post
                      You have convinced me, Bob..

                      Still the 'Australia' Hutch ...could be the right one

                      I would be more convinced if I knew that she was pointed in that direction by
                      the descendant of Toppy (I've left her a question, but as she's an author, I think that she's a bit 'protectionist' of her research as well).

                      I expect that SOME of her research is correct -but how to sort the chaff from the wheat ????
                      Of course it could be the right one, just as any of the thousands of George Hutchinsons in the world in 1888 could be the right one. The trick is to find some sort of link between them.

                      I wouldn't set much store by the KK trick of saying she has information from descendents. She did that with Alfred Pearson saying that all her findings were backed up by one of his descendents, however when we checked with this chap we find that he had dismissed her as some sort of loony and told her not to contact him again.

                      I can't recall any of her research being accurate.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Don't worry Bob -I do believe you !!
                        http://youtu.be/GcBr3rosvNQ

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          This is Karen's reply to my e-mail :

                          Karen

                          Admin




                          Subject: Australian Hutchinsons Sat 19 Jun - 5:21

                          --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                          Mr. Donald and I were in contact via e-mail approximately six months ago. He informed me that the Hutchinson branch of their family do have relatives in Australia. He has a website on his family tree with photos of both George and Reginald Hutchinson which I had provided to him. His site is where I obtained the photo of Emily Jane (shown above). Another family that is related to George are the Knott family. Emily Jane Hutchinson (George's sister) married a James Knott.

                          Mr. Donald is an elderly gentleman who is the grandfather of William Donald, whose wife's name is Poppy. The information can be found here:

                          George William Hutchinson http://donaldfamily.co.uk/15/18074.htm
                          Emily Jane Hutchinson (George's sister) http://donaldfamily.co.uk/33/17066.htm
                          Reginald E. (George's son) http://donaldfamily.co.uk/16/7175.htm
                          James Knott (Emily's husband) http://donaldfamily.co.uk/33/17065.htm

                          Mr. Donald's contact email is donald-family@blueyonder.co.uk



                          Effectively, it doesn't tell anything much. I think that the family trees are on Casebook somewhere.

                          The most interesting info for me, is that Toppy's sister would appear to be living in Kent or have just moved to London when Hutch went to Romford..
                          (S***, another theory blown !)
                          http://youtu.be/GcBr3rosvNQ

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X